Scout: I don’t know who would take Shaq

Shaq's still a monster. But will he take that price down?
A lot of scouts have written Shaq off. A lot of them think he hurts a team. That he won’t be willing to settle for a pay cut (Howard Beck of the New York Times reports that Shaq wants $8 million per year — wait, $8 million???). As the days of the offseason pass by, Shaq is reportedly turning a lot of teams off.
Twenty-three days have passed since the free-agent market opened. Sixty-five players have signed new contracts, including 13 centers. Darko Milicic got $20 million. Johan Petro got $10 million.
Yet O’Neal — the Most Dominant Ever, according to the syntactically awkward title he gave himself — is unemployed. Is this the end? Possibly.
This limbo is largely self-created. O’Neal, according to team executives, is seeking an $8 million salary. He wants a two-year deal. He is 38. He has trouble staying healthy. He can be helpful in spurts, but he is no longer the menacing figure who once ruled the paint.
“I don’t know who takes him,” said an Eastern Conference scout, citing O’Neal’s diminished production.
Potential suitors keep drifting away.
There you go. That’s the bad side of Shaq right there. That’s the sober view without offseason beer goggles.
If he keeps asking for $8 million, Shaq is destined to be unemployed next season. So that price will come down. But will it come all the way down to the minimum? Or would the Celtics have to give up Sheed’s contract? I want him for the minimum. He’s worth rolling the dice at that price. But I don’t think I’d be willing to trade Sheed’s contract for Shaq, unless the Celtics could somehow finagle Anthony Parker into the deal. And the Cavs would likely have to be roofied to include Parker — with the loss of Lebron, Parker and Jamario Moon are their only proven wings. Umm, you know, if you really want to call those guys proven.
Plus, remember: Shaq is a free agent, so he isn’t on the Cavs salary. If I’m not mistaken, that means they wouldn’t get any cap relief if they traded for Sheed’s retiring contract. That contract holds zero value to them.
Related posts:





He scored 12 points and grabbed almost 7 boards last season. Can he play like he did even 3 years ago? No. But he’s good enough to play for another season. Even better than Kwame Brown.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
“Even better than Kwame Brown” isn’t exactly the best compliment you’ve ever given out.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I’m not sure about Shaq,
I’d take him all day w/o a single hesitation for a vet minimum contract, and if he understands he’s no longer a starter,
Damn he could rebound that rock and score a few points just thanks to his size and bulk, we’d have a terrific (although old as hell) bunch of big man,
In the meantimen given his crazy salary expectations (8 mil u gotta be kiddin me), I’m not I’m not even sold on his willingness to play off the bench for limited spurts.. he could end up killing that harmony we now have in the locker room and THAT would be more damaging than losing the rebound battle during the postseason
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Why would you want parker? We have three point guards on this team already. Shaq is washed up but he can still bang, and frankly, the way the free agent market is looking I’m not sure the celtics can do better at that position. I don’t think we need him though. They would be better off talking Rasheed out of retirement or taking that money and getting a 2 or 3 to back up allan and pierce. Also why did they sign Daniels? I think Ainge knows this free agency may not work out for the C’s the way he hoped. Daniels doesn’t fit with this team so if Ainge resigns him he’s either thinking their is no-one better or he’s trying to lure Josh Howard. I think Howard is a bad fit too though. One thing is for sure, everyday that Ainge waits to pull the trigger the good free agents are leaving. Do you know who was invited to camp from summer league? Besides the big guy and the Northeastern Kid? What are the chances one of those guys can help us?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Parker is not a point guard at all
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Not even a little bit.
Like or Dislike:
0
1
parker sucks—if shaq wants to play for celtics he knows there is no way they can pay him that—-so thats a mute point—sign and trade could be hard—so the minimum is the highest possibilty
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Parker can shoot and he plays a little D. The Celtics would be lucky to have him off the bench.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
lucky—no—-they would clearly be desperate —he was terrible 8 years ago in toronto—why do u think lebron left—guys like anthony parker were in the starting line-up— cant shoot in playoffs and is really old
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Can’t shoot in the playoffs… BUT shot 46% from three in last year’s playoffs. Sorry, please play again.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
the guy is invisible in playoffs—his percentage is high b/c he probably took 5 shots a game—-36 years old—pass im good
Like or Dislike:
0
0
i hate invisible playoff players—they get their stats early in games—and never make a difference when it counts—that team was lebronnn lebron and more lebron, with an ocassional mo williams sighting
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Parker’s just solid. He doesn’t make mistakes, drills three-pointers and plays some D. The type of guy you can win with, as long as he’s not counted on to do too much.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
You’d think the highest paid NBA player in the history of the game (290 mil over his career) would be willing to take less money for a legit contender. Ego or necessity?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I’m thinking ego.
Like or Dislike:
0
0