Doc Rivers calls Jermaine O’Neal “absolutely sensational”
After yesterday’s 105-103 Celtics win, Doc Rivers called Jermaine O’Neal “absolutely sensational.”
“I thought Jermaine O’Neal was absolutely huge for us,” Rivers said. “We left him out there, he defended Tim [Duncan] one-on-one for the most part, he got blocks, he gave us defensive energy. He was absolutely sensational.”
Absolutely sensational? Eh, I don’t know if I’d go that far. But I guess it’s all about expectations. When you expect O’Neal to provide little-to-nothing, anything he offers can be considered sensational (though I would argue he was far from “sensational,” even though I was pleased by his efforts).
Looking ahead to Jermaine O’Neal at the beginning of the season, very few folks would have been pleased by a four-point, five-rebound effort. But this is January now, O’Neal has already aggravated quite a few fans in Boston, and so we are more than willing to accept a night when he notches more fouls than either points or rebounds.
Why are we so pleased to accept such a (statistically, at least) mediocre night? Because O’Neal displayed a pulse. Because he was actually on the court. Because, for one night at least, he didn’t look like a zombie.
I joke at O’Neal’s expense, because he’s come far short of fulfilling his promise. But, in all honesty, he’s starting to turn his season around. There was one play last night when Duncan isolated in the low post. O’Neal was all alone against the greatest power forward ever to walk this earth, with no double-team present and none on the way. Duncan went into his move, and ended up running across the lane for a sweeping hook that Spurs fans have seen for longer than a decade. Except there was O’Neal, moving his feet to stay with Duncan. There was O’Neal, timing the shot perfectly. There was O’Neal’s long arm, extending to contest the shot. The hook shot bounded off the rim, and I sat at home thinking, “Ahh. Now I remember why I was so excited to sign J.O. in the first place.”
There was also another play, a far less memorable play by any means. O’Neal caught the ball on the wing, and he jab-stepped his defender. The defender bit on the fake, and O’Neal let fly an 18- or 19-foot jumper. It caromed harmlessly off the back rim, and he was rewarded no points for his efforts. But it wasn’t the results which surprised me. Aging big men missing long jumpers has become something of a mainstay in Boston the past two seasons.
What surprised me was the life in O’Neal’s legs. Earlier this season, I can remember watching O’Neal execute the same jab step. It was like his feet were anchored to the ground, as if he had twelve sacks of potatoes tied to his heels and glue on the bottom of his shoe’s soles. Not yesterday. There was actual bounce in O’Neal’s step. Real bounce. Not Amare bounce, or Blake Griffin bounce, but bounce nonetheless. O’Neal is beginning to regain his athleticism.
“He’s starting to get his legs up under him,” said Paul Pierce. “This is like his fourth or fifth game back, so the good thing about J.O. is you see him getting better each and every game. You can tell he’s getting in better shape, he’s getting in a better rhythm, he’s understanding what we’re doing out there. I think as we go along, he’s going to play more and more. He was huge tonight. He really changed the game there on the inside, clogging up the middle, blocking shots. Even the threat to take some charges; he’s a great presence to have coming off the bench.”
He was huge? Absolutely sensational? Methinks Pierce and Rivers went a little overboard with their praise. But O’Neal’s improving, and it’s easy to see. It’s not difficult to envision a day in the near future when O’Neal becomes the impact player we expected from day one. (It’s also not difficult to envision a day in the near future when O’Neal finds himself stricken by a season-ending injury, but I digress.)
For now, we should be pleased with his improvements and look forward to more in the future. Maybe we should have held off on the harsh criticism. He’s dealt with injuries since all the way back in training camp, after all. (Then again, maybe injuries are his destiny. At the very least, they’re always a concern.) Oh, well. As you can probably tell, I’m conflicted about O’Neal’s prospects for the remainder of the season. But for now, things are beginning to look up.
“I thought we’d get this out of him, but I didn’t see it happening this qu–” Doc Rivers said, before excitedly forgetting to finish the word quickly. “I’m shocked by that, honestly. Watching him move right before we activated him and seeing him play now, I think he might have been holding out on us.”
Holding out? No, I strongly doubt it. O’Neal isn’t like Rasheed Wallace; he doesn’t have a “the regular season sucks” mentality.
But is he getting better? No doubt. Let’s just hope he can stay healthy, so his returns can continue to grow.
Related posts:





I though JO had another sucky night honestly, but Pierce is right in saying that you can see him getting his legs a bit more every game. Hopefully in a few weeks he’ll be on time with his rotations and will avoid a couple of those fouls which has to date been his main issue. He did also seem a bit more interested than his usual zombie self last night too. I think Pierce and Doc are just bigging him up a bit to try and boost his confidence in hopes that he will put more shots up etc in return. Can’t hurt I guess, nobody else off the bench is doing much at the moment.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I think his defense has been good. Without KG it’s really good to have Jermaine in case Shaq struggles with the pick and roll. On the other hand, I do think his rebounding numbers could be better.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Why would DA sign JO if as you say…”When you expect O’Neal to provide little-to-nothing”…??? Give him another 10-20 games of good health with his minutes going up and you will see why he was signed. He is getting better because he is getting his legs back and of all the ‘old’ guys he had far more ailments coming into the season. Considering he played 10 less minutes than Davis last night and got 3 more rebounds (23/5 vs Davis 33/2) I would say you were pretty harsh accessing his season to date. I know one game means nothing so let’s wait until mid Feb. before we say he’s not producing “as expected”. Go Cs…learn the value of rebounding better!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@James Danny Ainge didn’t sign him with those expectations, as I didn’t begin this season with those expectations. J.O.’s play has gradually lowered my expectations, and I assume the expectations of Doc and the rest of the C’s.
While he is getting better, one wonders if he can maintain his health all season. That’s always been a big problem for J.O.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Expectations mean the same as saying in a business meeting ‘let me go into the bathroom for 5 mintues and I’ll come back with some financial projections’. JO’s been injured more and has had farther to come since training camp. He wasn’t signed for the season, he was signed to deliver in the playoffs when his game, barring further injury, should rise to the level he has shown in the past. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I agree with you on everything. But “Barring further injury” is the one thing that might be a problem.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
If the Celtics can get healthy and avoid any further serious injuries and NR finds his game then I like our chances very, very much in winning #18. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0