Celtics fall apart, lose to Wizards 85-83

Two of the league's top young stars.
“If he played that to bank it on, I’ll give him a thousand bucks.” — Tommy Heinsohn
If tonight’s game had ended after the first quarter, I would have peacefully spent my night dreaming of sky rockets in flight. The Celtics shot something like 124% that quarter, and looked like a team set to take care of business rather than coast during the second night of a back to back.
But NBA games have four quarters (earth-shattering news), and the Celtics weren’t up to playing well in each of them. So it was that the Celtics missed 1,359 easy fourth-quarter shots, John Wall’s banked three broke their hearts, and Paul Pierce missed his shot — a routine stepback jumper — that would have won the game.
Sadly and excitingly (both at the same time), the Wizards remind me of the 2006-2007 Boston Celtics. They stink, and they look completely lost at most times, and they may or may not have the same basketball intelligence as my dumbass JV high school team. But if you squint your eyes hard enough, you could convince yourself they have talent worthy of acquiring a superstar.
The 2006 C’s had Gerald Green; the Wizards have JaVale McGee. The 2006 C’s had Tony Allen; the Wizards have Nick Young. The 2006 C’s had Rondo; the Wizards have Wall. The 2006 C’s had Al Jefferson; the Wizards have, umm, Yi Jianlian? Okay, so the comparison isn’t perfect. But these Wizards, like those Celtics, are young, dumb and talented.
Moving on, John Wall makes Rajon Rondo look slow. Not slow like Brian Scalabrine, but slow like Rondo normally makes opponents look. It’s a little disconcerting to see a point guard blow past Rondo like he’s a mere mortal, but Wall’s not exactly human. He’s tall, long and fast, like a cheetah with the basketball. And when he gets a full head of steam — or, even sometimes when he doesn’t — Wall can make Rondo look like an average athlete.
Of course, basketball isn’t all about who’s faster, or who can jump higher, or who would win an arm wrestling match. If it were, JaVale McGee might be the greatest player ever to walk the earth. At this stage in their careers, Rondo simply understands the point guard position in ways Wall can’t yet fathom. To be fair to Wall, Rondo understands the position like few others do, and Wall is only a rookie still undergoing a learning process. But I was struck tonight by how advanced Rondo’s knowledge of basketball is, when compared to a young wonderkid like Wall. Rondo has mastered quantum physics, and Wall’s still in freshman bio. That’s not to say Wall won’t become a master physicist himself one day — he’s on the honors track. But for now, Rondo thinks on an entirely different level.
Not that it matters. On this night, despite a stellar rebounding effort from Semih Erden, the Celtics weren’t meant to win. Or maybe they were meant to win, but decided not to try after the first quarter. Either way, a loss to the Washington Wizards is a loss to the Washington Wizards.
My dreams about sky rockets in flight will have to wait for another day.
Related posts:





Hey everyone…this is what I’ve been talking about all season…playing down to sub .500 teams. Lame loss. Lame fucking effort. Beat on the boards and PP & GD go 3-7 in FTs. SE fills in admirably for Shaq so at least he showed up. The others, not so much. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@james fuck man give it a rest the celtics had an off night where they had trouble scoring, at least in the second half. your fairy tale dreams of the celtics coming out every night to destroy teams by 50 points and give their 100% effort like its a game 7 of the finals is never going to happen. the celtics are going to lose every once in a while and its fine the worlds not going to end
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@rondeezy…SA and the Lakers lose to quality teams and the Celtics lose to suck ass teams and I have “fairy tale dreams”???. Go read the other comments on all the blogs and maybe you’ll understand that while I accept losses, I don’t think losing to crappy teams like the Wizards is acceptable. Many others don’t either. Maybe in your world it’s OK, but not in mine. Yes, they’re going to lose. But if your happy with the effort given vs these shit teams then great for you. Why is it that every ‘off night’ the Celtics have you and others defend it as no big deal but it’s ALWAYS vs these type of teams? The Celtics beat a good Utah playoff team and the next night piss all over that with this mediocre display. Maybe PP should give back the $250K he made tonight? Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@James
They may have lost to a bad team, but it’s the second night of a back to back and this isn’t the team your going to be watching in the playoffs. Who cares If they lose to this kind team during the regular season. They’re still going to be in the playoffs. They will play their asses off then. Anybody remember the big run last year when nobody thought we would be LeJackass and we did. Some didn’t think we would be able to come past Dwights flying elbows. But we did. We were four points away from an 18th banner. They are doing just fricken fine. They still have one of the top three records in the league. I agree with Rondeezy; give it a rest man.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@ james lakers have more losses to crap teams and it not ALWAYS against these types of teams. out of the 10 losses 5 came from shit teams. no matter who the opponent is no game is 100% like you make it sound to be, you never know what can happen in any game in the nba. the celtics give the same effort every night, maybe some nights a little more maybe against teams like the lakers and definitely in the playoffs but you cant expect them to play their heart out every single game like you dream and preach about. the difference is some nights their shots go in, some nights dont. yesterday it did, today it didnt, simple as that. clearly the celtics were off today as you saw ray miss a dunk and blow a wide open 3 pointer with no one within like 20 feet of him in the final minutes. the c’s dont gather around a table before the game and decide how hard they should play and how many shots they should miss based on their opponents record as you make it sound. they dont lose because they want to lose and yeah ive seen your other comments for awhile and all the freakin time regardless of if the c’s win or lose youre always saying some pessimistic ass stuff in every comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@Nick & @ rondeezy… I guess you guys are too young to have watched the Bird-era teams? They showed up every night and never took a night off. Yes they lost. Losses happen for many reasons but the regular season is about preparing for the playoffs and I agree it is always best when healthy. My issue is that the Celtics are currently last in rebounding (30th – Lakers #2 and SA #6 – getting Perk back will help though). There’s an old adage that ‘how you practice is how you play the game’. So how you play the regular season is likely how you play in the playoffs. Yes the Celtics flipped the switch last year and had a great run but the got killed on the boards in that last Game 7 (-13). But last year was the first time in the history of the league that a team was able to coast through the regular season and then flip the switch and get as far as they did. You want to trust that they can keep doing that or would you rather they give max effort all the time (like the best Celtic teams have done since I started watching long ago) and fix the things they are weak on, like their rebounding and too many turnovers and fouls? I prefer they play hard all the time and be sharp for the playoffs. You think NR’s shot selection lately is going to fly against the Heat or Orlando? Or GD’s lack of rebounding? So I have issues. Again and for probably not the last time, I LOVE this team on paper when healthy and believe they can get their 18th title. But when I see them let crap teams exploit them and make them look like they don’t care then I have an issue. Thanks for letting me have my opinions. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
P.S. ….even Shaq sees it so why don’t you? From the ESPN Celtics blog today –
Shaq spoke at length about the team’s struggles against weaker opponents.
“[We] can’t keep playing with people,” O’Neal said. “Great teams stay dominant at home, really beat the teams they’re supposed to beat, and stay above .500 on the road. We’re supposed to beat [the Pistons] every time, but not by three, not by five, but [by double-digits]. We can’t keep playing with people. However, we’re still learning each other, we’re getting better every game.
“We just have to learn to put our foot on people’s necks and kill ‘em right away. We can’t keep playing with people.”
On Saturday night in the nation’s capital, the Celtics played with people. Despite building a 15-point first-quarter lead against the host Wizards, Boston went cold from the floor, lost its aggressiveness, and watched rookie John Wall bank in a key late-game 3-pointer to lift his 13-win team to an 85-83 triumph.
The Celtics’ loss on Saturday marked the fifth time this season they’ve fallen to a club with a record below .500, which suggests they’ve had difficulty maintaining a high level of play for a full 48-minute span against inferior opponents….
Go read the other blogs as I mentioned. I give credit when they win and SE played great but again I expect better from the veterans. Go CS…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I agree with James. And the C’s need to be fighting for that top seed in the East. The conference is obviously much better this year, and they don’t want to be playing Game 7 in Miami or Orlando or Chicago, the three teams that are right on their asses right now. Yes, the Bird Era (or Jordan/Magic for that matter) saw teams bringing it every night. I’m disgusted by the loss to the Wizards.
If I showed up like that to my job, I’d be fired.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@James
I’ll give it to you that i never watched the bird era teams but your point when the C’s lost to the Lakers in game seven is (in my opinion) irrelevant. They collapsed down the stretch like they did a lot in the regular season, but when your making the point that they lost because of lack of rebounding your leaving out details. They didn’t have KP and they had lacadasical ‘Sheed trying to do the job. If we had KP in that game not only would we have probably won, Gasol probably wouldn’t have had the10 plus offensive rebounds he did.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@Nick…you need to read the stat box from Game 7. Sheed had 8 rebs. The player that did not rebound that night was KG (only 3 rebs) and the people guarding Kobe who had 15 rebs (PP had 10 rebs but didn’t box out very well and MD). Here’s the link -http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2010061713
Riley’s mantra during his Laker title years was “no rebounds, no rings”. It stands today and I think the Celtics are in trouble (KP being back notwithstanding) if guys like Davis, MD, and even NR don’t start rebounding better. Everyone has to focus more on this issue. Better rebounding will make these type of games go the Celtics way a whole lot easier.
And if you had watched Bird/McHale/Ainge/DJ then you would be as horrified as I am when the Cs play down to these inferior teams. After-all, don’t they want the #1 seed and home court advantage? Losing to teams they should be beating isn’t going to get them that advantage. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@James
I don’t understand what your point on this rebounding in ‘Game 7′ issue is. The point still stands: Lakers only won by 4 points. If KP is in the game it’s at least arguable and almost completely safe to assume that the C’s would win the game. It doesn’t matter that Kobe had a lot of rebounds, as you can assume that KP would have stopped some of Gasol’s offensive rebounds and that would, in theory, have won the game for us. If the Lakers won by 10 or 15 I would agree but they didn’t. KP would clearly have had a positive effect on that game.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@Brad…the point is KP wasn’t in the game and therefore the Celtics did have to deal with Kobe’s 15 boards. So yes, Koe getting 15 boards was HUGE. Yes, it was a 4 pt game and I believe the refs (differences in fouls in that game and over the last 3 games specifically) and Gasol’s foul on RR (never called with 1:32 left) when he shoved RR to the ground to get a rebound, made a layup and got a FT were the cause of that loss. But if the Celtics rebounded as in 2008 their title year (they were something like 8th in the league that season) then the score wouldn’t have been 4 pts but more likely a good 10pts plus for the Cs. Rebounding is defense and the Celtics cannot allow Kobe to get 15 nor can they be happy being currently lLAST in the league. Yes, that will improve as KP/DW/JO come back but these losses to inferior teams might not be happening (as Shaq stated) if these guys rebounded better (especially the bench). Lastly, you can what if that last Game 7 all you want but what if KP plays and PP gets injured? So what if-ing makes no sense. You play with who you got. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@James
You can’t excpect guards to do a whole shit load of rebounding, ecsspecially Nate robinson who isn’t even 6 feet tall.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
You’re killing me James. You’re gonna fault a team that had some really tough injuries to deal with last year to key players (see PP’s squirting knee and KG’s dragging leg, Ray’s severe thigh bruise in the finals) for losing ON THE ROAD, against the Lakers, in the finals, in Game 7, by only 4 points, without their starting center and their best rebounder clearly hobbled and with their backup center, Sheed, having to leave the game early because his back just couldn’t take it???? Are you kidding me? Rebounding and effort are important but seriously man, you have to chill on these guys. I’m really glad you’re not the coach.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Brad…when did I say all those things you just listed? Your question was about rebounding. Maybe if you really read my post you would see that I spoke solely about rebounding and the refs. So let’s remove the refs issue and concentrate on rebounding. I don’t remember PP’s squirting knee but he had a very nice game of 18/10. But he was guarding Kobe and his responsibility is to block him out. TA was gusrding Kobe too and he had ) rebs. RA guarded him too and he only had 2 rebs. Nobody blocked Kobe out all night long. He’s a SG not a forward but he crashed the boards all night as he knew what a difference it could make. Too bad the Cs didn’t understand that as well. The Cs lost on the Lakers offensive glass as they gave up 23 offensive rebs. So yes it came down to effort and who wanted it more. That being said the Cs, injuries and whoever was or wasn’t there, had a responsibility to rebound. As far as not being the coach I do believe I could at least get the importance of rebounding across to them unlike Doc. Sure doesn’t seem like he ever discusses it in post game reviews. Hope I cleared this up but maybe we just should agree to disagree and move on to the next game? Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
The reason I listed all those things is not because I didn’t read your post and somehow thought you did. Yes, you’re talking about rebounding. I get it. I am too. What I’m saying is that when someone beats let’s say the Lakers, and Kobe didn’t play that game then it’s rightful to put an asterisk next to that win and say, “Nice win, but Kobe didn’t play.” There’s a reason teams try to stack good players at every position. If winning was just a matter of ANY available player boxing out and playing with effort then fuck, why are we waiting for Perk to come back at all? There’s a reason why the Spurs look like they could take the whole thing this year and it has to do with key players being healthy. When key players are old, unhealthy, banged up, especially key big men then I don’t care who’s boxing out and rebounding, winning becomes much harder to do. My point is that you can break it down however you want, but there are few sane people on this earth that would look at last year’s bruised and battered Celtics team that crawled into the post season looking like they’d get bounced in the second round, then make an inspired run at the golden ball and almost beat the Lakers without home court advantage and say they have a lack of effort. You can pinpoint rebounding as an issue, and yes, last year it was an issue, but again key players were damaged all season long and beating the Lakers in LA is an extremely tough thing to do, especially when the Lakers were able to limit Rondo who could have been the difference maker. We lost to Orlando in 2009 because KG was out. Key players go down, your chances of winning go down. It’s as simple as that. And that goes double in this case when the big 3 were really hampered by injuries. Look up PP’s squirting knee when you get the chance. The guy was going through some shit. I’m actually amazed that the Celtics team from last year made it as far as they did with really their three most important players as beaten down as they were. It’s a testament to their effort and resilience. I get it, “No rebounds, no rings.” How about a new one, “No bodies, no banners.”
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Brad…you make some excellent points. Here’s Jerry West today about the Lakers getting “old” and their defensive struggles this season -http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/news/story?id=6053767. Personally, I think today’s players coast too much during the season especially the older teams that just want to ‘perform’ 100% in the playoffs. The Cs did a fantastic job of flipping the switch last season and will likely do it again. Maybe if Doc realized this he would then play the rookies and others on the bench to prepare them for the playoffs so they would be ready and could give better results? But if the goal is to have home court then the Celtics need to play harder and work towards that goal so they don’t have to play in LA or SA. My only real issues this season are showing up (i.e. effort vs the suck teams) and rebounding (certainly KP should bring much help to their stats but others will then fall off). Hopefully, we’ll be healthy when it matters but in the mean time I expect the players that take the court to rebound better because if they did they wouldn’t beat Det by a couple or blow 16pt leads to the Wizards. Let’s see how they respond vs Cleveland. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0