Morning Walkthrough: Celtics in bind as Marquis Daniels recovers
The Morning Walkthrough is a set of links to Boston Celtics articles throughout the internet, designed to get your day started the right way.

Brotherly love. The Celtics watch as Marquis Daniels lays motionless on the floor.
Paul Flannery, WEEI – “He was released from New England Baptist Hospital on Monday and has full use of his motor skills. ‘He’s in good spirits, all things considered,’ Daniels’ agent Mark Bartelstein said. ‘He’s frustrated because he wants to play, but he’s a lot better off than he was on Sunday.’ There are so many variables when it comes to Daniels, who suffered a bruised spinal cord on a play that featured limited contact with Orlando’s Gilbert Arenas. After the game, the Celtics revealed that Daniels has had spine issues in the past and it was those issues that caused him to leave Game 5 of last year’s conference finals. There’s no current timetable for Daniels’ return — he could be out a month or two, or he could be out longer. As team doctor Brian McKeon noted Sunday, the treatment for spinal issues primarily involves, ‘observation and time.’ ‘It’s going to be a process,’ Bartelstein said. ‘We’re going to gather as much medical information as we can.’ While Daniels recuperates, the Celtics are in a bit of a bind. Their depth at the wing was already thin, and now it’s basically down to Von Wafer.”
Kirk Minihane, WEEI – “Last summer, I asked an NBA coach who — among other coaches and players– was the most disliked player in the NBA. ‘Kevin Garnett,’ he said without blinking. Who, I wondered, was second on the list? ‘Everyone else is tied,’ he deadpanned before walking away. … Here’s the thing, though: Garnett — to his eternal credit — has no interest trying to rehabilitate his public image. None. … You know why? Because he doesn’t care what you think, what I think, what players and coaches from other teams think and he sure doesn’t care what Spike Lee — who has directed exactly one passable movie since Garnett entered the NBA in 1996 — thinks. … Is Kevin Garnett a punk? No. He doesn’t try to seriously injure anyone, he doesn’t bitch if the Celtics win but he scored six points, he plays hurt, he cares only about winning, all that stuff. Is Kevin Garnett a dirty player? I think that’s getting closer to the truth. One thing is for sure: He doesn’t care either way. And neither should you.”
Mike Bresnahan, LA Times – “Before the Lakers even think about their rematch with Boston, they have a two-hour surprise awaiting them. They’ll watch edited video of their fruitless loss to the Celtics just a handful of days ago, a painful, yet, they hope, productive investment toward their game Thursday in Boston. There wasn’t much to like about Jan. 30 from their perspective. Kobe Bryant gave them an ‘F’ for team defense. Ron Artest got kneed in the thigh and then was run ragged by Paul Pierce (32 points). The Celtics shot 60.3 percent, their third-best accuracy ever against the Lakers.”
Mark Murphy, Boston Herald – “In his attempt to become an NBA point guard, Bradley is starting from scratch. He played only one year at Texas, not exactly a stretch of time that prepares a point guard for NBA conditions. In that respect, the D-League is slightly better for Bradley’s education. ‘I’m definitely, definitely starting from scratch, but the D-League for me is a step above college, and then going to the NBA is the next step,’ he said. ‘That’s how they have it set up and you can see why. In the D-League, I felt like I was in college again, and now the players are better up here (in the NBA). But when my name is called I’m going to come in with that swagger to my game.’ … ‘A lot of (the D-League) was getting playing time, getting the rust off my game, and being put into situations that I can be fit in,’ he said. ‘This point guard situation is important — bringing the ball up the court, being pressured. I have to take chances and try different things out. I could do that, and work on my game. It makes me feel more comfortable now being up here, because I’ve been working on those things.’”
Greg Payne, ESPN Boston – “Kendrick Perkins played a season-high 35 minutes, 25 seconds in the Celtics’ 94-89 loss to the Charlotte Bobcats on Monday night — little more than 24 hours after logging nearly 33 minutes in an ultra-physical victory over the Orlando Magic on Sunday afternoon. Don’t expect to hear any complaints out of Perkins though, who’s publicly lobbied for more minutes ever since he made his season debut two weeks ago after rehabbing the torn ACL he suffered in his right knee in Game 6 of last year’s NBA Finals. After playing a then season-high 28 minutes in the Celtics’ 109-96 victory over the Los Angeles Lakers last Sunday, Perkins said in a postgame sideline interview: ‘I wanted to go 30 [minutes].’ … The Celtics’ continuous struggles on the second half of back-to-backs will be well chronicled after Monday’s loss, particularly after so many of Boston’s players put forth such sluggish play. Perkins, though — with such little support behind him — played above all of that chatter. On a night when possible fatigue and a lack of focus served as obvious culprits in Boston’s loss, it was Perkins who played as if neither should ever serve as a passable excuse for an uninspiring defeat.”
Julian Benbow, Boston Globe – “‘Everybody’s dealing with injuries on this team and we’re no different from it,’ said Kevin Garnett after the Celtics went with just 10 healthy players in a loss to Charlotte Monday night. ‘Quis is probably a lot more hard on us right now, just because it was so sudden . . . We’re just hoping he’s all right, and everybody has to carry a load . . . and go forward.’ Coach Doc Rivers has used eight starting lineups this season, but he said the injuries haven’t brought him to a boiling point yet. ‘I never think that way, I never have,’ Rivers said. ‘You’ve got to keep rolling. I really try not to live in the past or in the what-ifs. I tell our guys that all the time. We’ve just got to keep playing and finding a way.’”
Gary Washburn, Boston Globe – “Boston entered Monday night’s loss to Charlotte Bobcats with injuries to swingman Marquis Daniels, centers Shaquille O’Neal, Jermaine O’Neal and Semih Erden and reserve guard Delonte West. With the returns of Jermaine O’Neal and Daniels uncertain, there has been speculation about the Celtics adding another player. [Kevin] McHale said he believes the Celtics have enough depth. ‘I’m a big Marquis Daniels fan, I like him, it was tough injury and scary seeing that whole thing but I think the Celtics what they have going for them is a ton of depth,’ he said. ‘All of a sudden Delonte West is going to come back and I really like West’s game. He plays with other great players so well. With the Celtics as they lose one guy they gain another guy. And I don’t think they have to make a big trade.’”
A. Sherrod Blakely, CSNNE – “Ray Allen sees the problem being much broader than simply placing the blame on the scheduling gods. He sees a Celtics team that, at times, relies more on its name than its game to be successful. ‘In our locker room, we always have to remember that we’re not superior to any team because we’re the Celtics or because we think we’re good or we have All-Stars on our team or whatever the case may be,’ Allen said. ‘What makes us better is because . . . we’ve proven what we have done. Anything going forward, we have to prove that.’”
Got a tip? An article you think should be included? Send an email to jayking@celticstown.com or hit me up on Twitter @CelticsTown.
Related posts:





A Bruised spinal cord? I did not see anyone hit Daniel’s back at all. It just looked like he fell awkwardly. Anyways, I guess Paul Pierce will be playing more minutes at the SF. They can probably use Von Wafer, but he’s too small to play that position. Is Delonte back from his injury?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I really have to wonder if Marquis should continue to play basketball. On the other hand, I recognize that if a doctor were to tell me that, if I were to keep doing what I’m doing in my vocation, I would run the risk of serious injury or death, and I had to ask myself whether I was willing to stop, I wouldn’t think about it for a fraction of a second. Of course I wouldn’t stop. So I can understand if Daniels wants to keep playing.
Allen is obviously right, or rather, half right, about this team’s struggles in ‘games they should win’. There’s nothing wrong with relying on the intimidation affect of the name, “Celtics”. Every great team does that. Back in the 90s, when the Bulls came to town, they had the game half won before they stepped out on the court. But in order for the intimidation affect to work to your advantage, YOU HAVE TO ACTUALLY WIN THE GAMES!!! Once you’ve lost as many ‘games you should win’ as we have, you no longer can talk about ‘games you should win’. Every game we play from now on has to be regarded as a likely L. The winner’s swagger, so to speak, has to be earned. This team has demonstrated to every other team in the league that it can be had. That is going to make every single game we play that much tougher.
So we can pretty much just forget about homecourt advantage in the playoffs at this point. Unless there is some amazing turnaround, we can expect this team to keep on losing to teams we once thought they should beat. And once that becomes established as a regular thing, which has now happened, beating the really good teams become tougher too. Part of the reason you want to play well against weaker teams is to develop and maintain good habits. You’ll really need those good habits in the climactic games. Once bad habits, like not boxing out, like not hustling after loose balls, like not moving on offense, become ingrained, it’s hard to leave them at the locker room door when heading out to the Big Game. So far the Cs have done well in Big Games, but there too the Mavs have shown that the Cs can be had. Don’t expect the success in Big Games to continue. The Celtics’ season is in crisis right now.
This team reminds me a lot of the 1980s Celtics. They too used to lollygag around for 3 quarters against good teams. Then they’d turn it on in the 4th and usually win. The big difference, though, is that the 1980s Big Three had unstoppable offensive firepower. This team doesn’t have that. Once Bird, Mchale and co. decided to clamp down on D, the game was usually over, because their O was a given. When this team clamps down on D, their O is not a given. Quite the opposite. This team’s O depends so heavily on team-oriented play, strong passing and plenty of movement off the ball, all of which CANNOT be turned on and off, that chances are the O won’t be there when they clamp down on D late in the game, unless Pierce’s HeroBall game is on fire, or something. The Cs D can be turned on and off, but their O can’t be.
That’s why it so often happens that, once we get serious and tune in defensively in the 4 quarter, we can’t seem to get our O going, and we lose, or just barely win.
This team was highly motivated for the first half of this season by their frustration over losing game 7 last year. They seemed to give full vent to that frustration finally when they beat the Lakers at home the weekend before last weekend. But now we are on to a different question: how badly does this team want to win a championship THIS year? So far, in the games since the big win over the Lakers, the answer coming back is that this just isn’t the Celtics’ year. The loss to the Mavs was hard to explain, coming from a team with its sights set on 18. The Orlando game started out looking like another L, until the team caught fire, after Quis went out. The Charlotte game? Let’s just try to blot that one out.
There’s no shame in losing to NBA teams. Charlotte and Dallas are both surging and ANY NBA team is made up of some of the best basketball players in the world. I’m no longer upset when the Cs lose. Hell, they are still a pretty good team, playing in the best league in the world. Life is good. I love the way Charlotte is playing now, with our own legend Paul Silas as coach, and Dallas is such a tough team, you have to admire that.
And let’s face it, as much as we want to believe that our Big Three drank from the Fountain of Youth over the summer, they are OLD. They simply can’t carry this team like they once could. And Rondo? We all see the flashes of genius, and they seem to be coming more often, and he seems to learn more every day about rounding out his game and about leadership. I look forward to seeing his career develop. But the difference between him and Derrick Rose at this point is that, even though Rondo has potential that Rose probably can’t even understand (Rose being the Hero superstar and Rondo being the Catalyst superstar), much less aspire to, Rose is ready NOW to be the pillar of his team, the go-to guy. Rondo, by contrast, surges to the fore, at times, but then fades back; he vacillates between energized motivation and passivity/diffidence.
Rondo is not able to pick up all of the load the Big Three are slowly dropping, not yet.
It will be interesting to see how the rest of the story plays out. I foresee the Celtics continuing to fade in the homestretch and then getting bounced early in the playoffs.
I think that to expect a repeat of last year’s near-miraculous playoff resurrection is pollyanna to the extreme. The East is looking a lot tougher this year, and then whoever comes out of the West is sure to be an equally tough team. Are we better and tougher and more hungry than ALL those teams? It’s not looking like we are.
It’s possible, of course, that the Cs will transition from being motivated by last year’s loss to being motivated by wanting to win this year. And it’s possible that Rondo’s rate of development will continue to astonish even his critics, and that the bench will get healthy again and will rise to the occasion more often than not. However things turn out, the second half of the season is a story waiting to be written, a story that promises to be interesting at least. And, without a doubt, that Big Four synergy is still the best damn thing in the league, better than all the Lebrons, Kobes, Wades and Nowitskys rolled together, when it is on fire.
Will we see The Over The Hill Gang and the Kid Who Couldn’t Shoot Straight, after the league intermission? Or will we see The Crunch-time Kid and the Three Amigos?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@paul…another good analysis but I take major exception when the Cs lose, even though it happens and is going to happen, but its how they lose that bothers me. You’re right about the offense vs the defense but if they actually applied themselves to the d-side of the equation then the off-side would actually be easier and less of a concern as they would likely be enjoying better leads instead of giving them away or coming out flat. It’s one thing to be flat offensively but quite another being flat on the defense. Playing defense is all in the head and is about effort. The fact that they don’t do this, which is their best overall ability in order to win games, on a nightly basis is one of my two major issues (rebounding is the other of course) with this team. RA has it right so now at least their talking about it and will hopefully change their ways before they lose their conference home court advantage. Having everyone healthy will help but I’d just like to see CONSISTENT effort for each game. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0