• Home
  • About Celtics Town
  • Contact Us
  • NBA Blog Links
  • Privacy Policy

Celtics fall victim to lack of energy, and Los Angeles Clippers, 108-103

When an NBA team earns a 23-point deficit (and the Celtics did earn theirs), even the most invigorated comeback attempt needs the perfect storm to succeed — timely baskets, key forced turnovers, missed shots from the opponent.  That’s not me calling the Celtics attempted comeback tonight “most invigorated,” though they played hard in the second half. Just pointing out how they would have needed near-perfection to overcome such a putrid start.

And it was certainly putrid; the first half was far more Gerald Green era than Bill Russell era. DeAndre Jordan had 2,583,342 dunks, every shot the Clippers took (or, at least, so it seemed) was uncontested, and the Clippers manhandled the Celtics in every way possible. Blake Griffin did not put any Celtics on a poster in that first half, but his teammates more than made up for him — 67.6% shooting isn’t very bad.

The Celtics did come back, though it proved futile. The comeback, as most comebacks do, started with defense. One stop at a time, the Celtics scratched their way back into the game. There were offensive heroics, of course, but you don’t get Ray Allen transition three-pointers without stops. You don’t get Rajon Rondo reverse layups without stops. You don’t cut a 23-point lead down to four points without stops, and consistent stops.

When the Celtics played their best basketball, a shocking five took to the parquet floor. Carlos Arroyo played shooting guard, Jeff Green manned power forward, and Nenad Krstic held down the fort at center. Not a lineup I ever expected would play so well for the Boston Celtics, but, well, I didn’t expect the Celtics to trail the Clips by 23 points on this night, either. Nor did I expect DeAndre Jordan to don his cape.

Arroyo, in his Celtics’ debut, looked freed. Like Miami had been his jail, and getting cut from the Heat was the best thing ever to happen to him. In ways we didn’t see in Miami, Arroyo played point guard. He didn’t just dribble the ball up the floor, pass to an infinitely more talented teammate, then spot up in the corner — no, he actually played a true point guard. He made a beautiful bounce pass to Krstic. Drained a jumper in the lane. Looked 2,400% more comfortable running Boston’s offense than Avery Bradley did, even though it was his first game, even though he was playing with a new offensive system and new teammates.

At fear of gushing too much about Arroyo’s four-point, two-assist debut, but stats did not do him justice and even the smallest pleasures left me grinning. At one point, Arroyo pushed the ball in transition without dribbling the ball, pitching the ball forward to Sasha Pavlovic, who had a wide open jumper. Pavlovic bricked the jumper, but still: the Celtics have a backup point guard who looks to know what he’s doing. Doc Rivers was so excited with Arroyo’s play, he even kept Arroyo in the game to play shooting guard alongside Rajon Rondo. And the strange combo worked, beautifully. If this is the Arroyo the Celtics get every night, I can handle it. In fact, I’ll really start to dig the Carlos Arroyo era.

On the other end of the “early returns from buyout additions” spectrum, there’s Troy Murphy. I’m still not willing to completely shut the door on Murphy’s potential. But — well, how do I put this nicely? — he hasn’t exactly shown us anything to get excited about. There’s the whole “he still hasn’t made a shot as a Celtic” stat, which isn’t at all terrific but doesn’t even tell the whole story. His legs look shot. His shots lack lift. Quite frankly, Troy Murphy looks washed up, in ways 30-year old shooting power forwards don’t normally look washed up. Maybe that’s because he’s still working himself into shape. Or maybe his game has fallen off a proverbial cliff, to the point of no return.

Kevin Garnett shot like Ben Wallace, which is to say he did not shoot very well. Mo Williams shot like Dave Hopla, which is to say he rarely missed. And the Celtics learned a valuable lesson today, one which they’ve learned too many times in the past two seasons:

Sleep-walking, against any NBA team (even the Clippers), will not earn a win.

Related posts:

  1. Celtics blow past Clippers, 95-89
  2. Can Vinny Del Negro please get the Clippers job?
  3. Red Claws Fall To Energy
  4. McHale on Clippers’ short list of head coaches
  5. The Green, Krstic eras begin with a win against Clippers, 99-92

categories Celtics Blog | Jay King | March 9, 2011

categories Boston Celtics, Los Angeles Clippers

7 Responses to “Celtics fall victim to lack of energy, and Los Angeles Clippers, 108-103”

  1. James says:
    March 9, 2011 at 10:37 pm

    Come on Jay, you can do much better than this. A couple of quick points before I really explain why they lost. CA has been in the league 8 yrs compared to AB’s 6 months and so I hope to fuck he’s a better PG. Lame and unfair comparison to put it bluntly. Then you bag on TM who played 5 mins and took 1 shot? How is ripping him fair based on that amount of time? I love Green but rip him for not rebounding. I still love PP but you NEVER rip him for his lack of rebounding.

    Here’s why the Cs lost and where their problems lie. The LAC (another sub .500 team) came in 6-25 on the road or 20% winning and looked like all-stars vs our HOFs. The Cs showed up, but not until the 2nd half and even then played crappy defense in the 4th qtr. PP had 4 rebs and got his first 2 with less than 2 mins to go in the 3rd. qtr. How come you don’t rip his ass? Maybe if he showed up in the first half of the game the outcome would have been different? And, his defense sucked against Gomes. As did the defesne vs Mo Williams (RR). Then there’s KG who decided that shooting all night and missing was in the best interest of the effort. And lastly, the group of forwards (minus KG) that played 72 mins and got a measily 5 rebs. That’s 1 every 12 mins or a whopping average of 1.25 per qtr. JG 22 mins and 1 reb/SP 8 mins and 0 rebs/PP 37 mins and 4 rebs/TM 5 mins and 0 rebs. Pathetic!!

    Why not write about the Cs lack of rebounding effort? And why no compliments for Krstic? He played a very good game even though he was weak defending vs Jordan. At least he showed up and made the effort to rebound. This Celtic team has an on-going BAD tendency to not show up vs the sub .500 teams and waltz in thinking a win is all but given. They got it handed to them tonight and they even had a chance to win but RR hoists 3 – miss and several other lame shots with tons of time on the clock in the 4th qtr were tossed up. I give kudos to the group that got them back into the game and frankly would have preferred they close it out as they made plays, defended, rebounded and showed up unlike the f’in starters. Go Cs…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Jay King says:
    March 9, 2011 at 11:04 pm

    Krstic, though he scored a lot, defended quite poorly. Yeah, it’s expected that Arroyo is better than Avery Bradley — but that doesn’t make it any less true. The entire Celtics’ defense stunk, except for stretches in the second half, so I didn’t feel like pointing out just one player.

    Paul Pierce, who you rip for his lack of rebounding every single game, averaged 8.0 rebounds per game while earning Eastern Conference Player of the Week last week. In the big picture, whether Murphy has anything left in the tank matters. Whether Pierce rebounded well against the Clippers, on March 9th, doesn’t.

    I am covering the game in Boston, which means I interview the players afterward, which means I needed to finish my recap by the exact second the game ended, which means my recap was incomplete. If I did mention Krstic, I would have explained a mixed bag — good offense, very bad defense (on both Jordan and Kaman).

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. James says:
    March 9, 2011 at 11:29 pm

    Maybe waiting a bit before posting might make more sense?

    Just because PP has one good week doesn’t mean he is worthy of rebounding praise. I am a stat fiend and track the stats qtr by qtr and in games the Cs lose or play against sub .500 teams he SUCKS; also at showing up vs those type of teams. Yes, he brings it when it’s the Lakers, Miami or some other playoff team but you have to show up every night not just when it suits you. And I called Krstic out on his defense if you re-read my comments.

    P.S. PP – he’s averaging 5.2 rebs this yr vs a career of 6.1 or 15% worse this season. So I can and will continue to rip him when he gets ZERO in a half. Lastly, regarding CA vs AB it does make it less true as you cannot compare a player on a HOF dominated team getting 5 minutes per game to an 8 yr veteran. Ever. That’s like comparing your game to a 6th graders. Go Cs…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. paul says:
    March 10, 2011 at 1:28 am

    In a way, this is so familiar. So often, the Cs barely show up, until it’s too late, and lose, or nearly lose, to a team they ‘should beat’. And, as always – Paul Pierce aside – the prime culprit seems to be Rondo. His stat line from tonight actually looks respectable, but we know better. In particular, I – unlike most people, I suppose – am not pleased when I see only two turnovers in Rondo’s stat line. It’s not that I want to see ten turnovers from Rondo, but when I only see one or two, it tells me that he didn’t play aggressively. When Rondo’s not aggressive, the team isn’t aggressive.

    The win streak everyone has been so in awe of, the one that supposedly proved Ainge’s genius, was very weak, for a win streak. The Trade continues to play out fairly predictably. In game after game, one or two people on the opposing team ‘goes off’ offensively. Typically it’s a Big Man that goes off, but sometimes it’s perimeter player, like Ellis, and Williams (not having the defensive anchor in the middle affects the perimeter defense too). In general, the Cs seem to be more powerful offensively, but less powerful on the boards and defending. Krstic seems to be bringing a little more than we expected, and Green seems to be bringing a little less.

    It comes down to this: when your future depends on a guy like Krstic suddenly turning into a defensive anchor, and on a guy like Jeff Green suddenly turning into an all-star, and on a guy like Murphy being a rebounding stud who nails 3s …. well, let’s just say that we need the Big Four to play like they never have before. And that brings us back to Rondo. I have no problem with Rondo taking 3s in crunchtime. We need that kid shooting. He is this team’s leader. Our problem with Rondo is his inconsistency, and the way the team seems to follow his lead when he’s not playing well. How can they help it? He’s usually running the offense and playing against the guy running the offense for the other team.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. chisala mulenga says:
    March 10, 2011 at 1:36 am

    Jay, first I have to say that you are a damn good writer and that is the reason I and many others visit your blog just to see what your opinion is for the night… Also do not feel the need to get too personal and reply to every single comment that does not agree with what you write. Let people have freedom of speech that way they will debate with themselves and not you and actually make the blog more interesting.
    Go CELTICS…GO CELTICS TOWN!!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Chris H says:
    March 10, 2011 at 1:50 am

    It’s on the starters tonight; they did not come out and set the tone to dominate. Do they not want the best record in the east? Maybe they need to check the standings. chicago is 2 games back in the loss column with an easy schedule to close their year. while the celts blow games like this, chicago was blowing out the bobcats tonight. across the leave, save for miami, the good teams are stepping up and putting teams away (take a look at the Lakers)

    I realize it’s a new group to assemble, but that’s no excuse (as PP tried to make tonight). And yeah, Rondo seems to be asleep in a lot of games. I still believe he’s being passive aggressive for the trade of his friend Perkins. It’s an F-you to management. If he doesn’t want to bring it, the C’s will lose.

    Questions for all: Do the C’s have time to gel by the playoffs? I’m not so sure. With all the injuries and new players, it’s like musical chairs. How can they get any real chemistry off the bench?

    60 pts in a half to the clippers is inexcusable. i’m disgusted by tonight’s effort

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. kennard says:
    March 10, 2011 at 2:33 am

    The starters need rest.They have been grinding out all season,because everybody else has been in the hospital !!!!!!
    KG needs rest,Rondo needs rest,Pierce needs rest and Ray needs rest.
    When Delonte comes back.Start him at SG with Arroyo at PG and see what happens.
    Doc needs to draw plays for Jeff Green,otherwise he will get lost,and he is talented enough that Doc should be drawing plays for him.Rest Pierce and start him.Rest Ray.Start West.
    Kristic got the memo to crash the boards and he’s earning his keep.As for his defense.To be fair,if Perkins was guarding Blake Griffin,he would have been dunked on too and WOULD have fouled him.Kaman would not have backed Perkins down,but Kaman is an underrated offensive player.The Clippers dunk on everyone,no big deal.
    Rondo takes too many defensive gambles,to many double downs and leaves his man wide open on the perimeter.Mo Williams had a more than lucky night,but still.
    This cannot happen,since eventually we will meet the Bulls in the Eastern Conf. Finals and he will go against Rose.
    Hopefully the O’Neal’s will be there to knock Rose on his ass when he goes in the paint,so he will have something to think about.
    Murphy’s only job should be to crash the boards.If he cannot do this simple task.He should not play in one single playoff game.
    The Perkins trade was all about the Bulls.Perkins was not healthy enough to even jump up for a rebound against Noah and Boozer and Deng,let alone sprint up the floor with them and if he can’t match their energy and not give you any offense,what’s is the point of having him on the floor.
    Kristic is slow on rotations but he can give you offense and you have to guard him.You don’t have to guard Perkins.And you don’t want Noah and Boozer roaming around,believe me.
    We can defend the pick and roll and should be alright defending the paint in the long run.Defending the perimeter is what we should be concerned about.And crashing the boards !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

← Delonte West’s injury return pushed back, plus other injury updates
Nenad Krstic a mixed bag in Clippers defeat →
  • Tiq IQ

    Boston Celtics tickets
  • Recent Posts

    • Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
    • Exit Interviews: Courtney Lee
    • Exit Interviews: Terrence Williams
    • Exit Interviews: Jeff Green
    • Exit Interviews: Chris Wilcox
  • Recent Comments

    • NBA Celtics Fan » Boston Celtics Daily Links – news, rumors, and opinion on Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
    • RSN » Boston Celtics Daily Links 5/18 on Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
    • NBA Celtics Fan » Boston Celtics Daily Links 5/18 on Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
    • marilyn matthews on Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
    • marilyn matthews on Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
  • Follow us


  • Blogroll

    • Ball Don't Lie
    • Boston Celtics Tickets
    • Boston Globe Celtics Coverage
    • Boston Herald Celtics Coverage
    • Celtics Blog
    • Celtics Life
    • CLNS Radio
    • CSNNE Celtics Coverage
    • D-League Digest
    • ESPNBoston Celtics Blog
    • Posting and Toasting
    • Red's Army
    • State of the Celtics
    • TrueHoop
    • Twitter Sports – Celtics
    • WEEI's Green Street
  •   Celtics Rumors & News >

Celtics Town | Boston Celtics blog | Celtics news is powered by WordPress

Dansette