Steely swagger
Sometimes it isn’t the heart of a champion, but a steely mindset. It’s remaining confident even when the losses pile up and the media counts you out and the fans begin to lose hope. It’s knowing you’ve done this before and you can do it again, even if conventional wisdom disagrees with you. It’s taking the last two months of the season and spitting on them, because you know there isn’t a single team that wants to see you come playoff time.
“The thing I’ve been impressed with is, it’s no alarm,’’ Jermaine O’Neal told the Boston Globe. “Nobody’s panicking. We understand if we play the way we’re supposed to play, we win.’’
The Boston Celtics had plenty of reason to doubt themselves, both this year and last. The basketball Grim Reaper had seemingly come for them, come to kill off the Big Three era with a rash of nagging injuries and old age, come to end championship-caliber basketball in Boston, at least for the time-being. But the Celtics had a trump card in their back pockets, the swagger of a champion, a shared confidence, or cockiness, an intangible stubbornness in their own abilities. They looked the Grim Reaper in his eyes, told him their time had not yet come, told him to visit the Cleveland Cavaliers and Orlando Magic instead.
You can crunch numbers for a long time, calculate the average margin of victory or the Hollinger rating or whatever else, but you can’t measure the belief these Celtics have in themselves, a belief which, I assume, comes from winning a championship. You can’t measure the value of looking at the guy in the locker room stall next to you and knowing you can rely on him, because you’ve done this before. When the Cavs drove over Boston with a Mack truck in Game 3 last season, at the TD Garden, it could have tore them apart. But pressure refines them, pressure makes them noble, and the Celtics didn’t lost to Cleveland again. When things went wrong for the Cavs, there was no past experience they could lean on, and thus adversity threw them into oncoming traffic.
“We’re going to have [adversity],” Doc Rivers told the Boston Globe. “It wasn’t an if. Be prepared for it. Embrace it, it’s a good thing. Enjoy the adversity. You find out who handles it well and who doesn’t, but even the ones who [don’t] at times, you hang in there with them, and eventually they’ll come through for you.’’
I’m not always a sucker for the intangible, but it’s hard to argue against the Celtics’ trust in themselves. You get the feeling they could lose 26 straight games (yet another Cavs reference) and still consider themselves the NBA’s best team. You get the feeling they could go down 0-3 in a series and still have no doubts they would come back. They’ve done this before and no matter what outside influences opine, no matter what advanced statistics or expert analysis tells them, think they can do it again. Sure, only five players remain from last season’s team, the same five who remain from 2008. But those five lead the rest. They instill a sense of calm during the furious storm of pressure.
For awhile, I thought Boston’s belief might be gone. I thought the Celtics might have too many new faces. I thought they might miss Kendrick Perkins for more than just his basketball talents. I thought the championship chemistry had been altered in a way that might be irretrievable. But it’s playoff time again and the Celtics are back to their old tricks, looking the Grim Reaper in his eyes and telling him it’s not their time.
Related posts:





I love what JO said. If we play our game, we win. Simple as that. But not so simple. The Heat are the very team most brilliantly designed to take advantage when our discipline slips, when our focus flags. These young lions can smell weakness and shred it. The value of experience and discipline will be tested, to the max. Tested and tested again.
Assuming we face the Heat, of course.
I really wish you’d stop talking about the Celtics Pride thing, as typified by this team, as demonstrated against the Knicks, as some kind of done deal. Yes, the Knicks series showed that the Celtics have risen to the occasion yet again. They have shown up and dialed in for these playoffs. But now the real challenge begins. That was just the first door. That was just taking attendance. The only thing it means is that we are here. It doesn’t mean we have what it takes. That is yet to be determined.
The video featured here is fantastic. Garnett in particular is going to be huge in this series. You mention the belief the Cs have in themselves. Yes, I think part of it comes from winning a championship. But it’s clear that most of it comes from the fact that the Big Three, and now the Big Four, have CHOSEN to blend their talents seamlessly. Sometimes they forget, and sometimes they squabble, and sometimes Paul refuses to let Rondo run the show, and sometimes Ray gets annoyed that he isn’t seeing the ball, and sometimes Garnett gets lost in the shuffle, but it always comes back to this; however these players came together, they long ago made the decision that they BELONGED together. No other team has this, not even the Heat.
It’s clear that the Cs DID miss Perkins badly, and still do, by the way. To pretend because they swept the Knicks that that proves that Perk really was a scrub after all and they never really needed the loser is such crap. They hit a wall when he was torn out from their long established unit, and that makes perfect sense. But they are still the Big Four, and obviously they have reconnected with their Big Four-ness. Now the key is Rondo. How well we do hinges, more than anything else, on how well the Big Three and Rondo embrace the changes that have brought them to the NOW, where Rondo is the main guy. This season has been all about that transition. It’s been hard at times, very very hard. But now all that work to redefine relationships pays off. Welcome to Center Stage, the Boston Celtics, featuring the Big Three, and led by Rajon Rondo…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
paul…in case you missed my post late last evening in the Doc returning post —
James | Tuesday, 26 April 2011 at 2:04 am
paul…here’s the real reason Perk was dealt:
Saturday night he played 4 mins and had 2 fouls. Came back in and got foul #3 in the 5th minute and sat with 0 rebs and 0 pts until the second half.
He finished with 19m – 1-2 and 0-0 fts – 2 rebs – 2 blks – 2 to – 4 pfs – 2 pts
Tonight – 27m 1-3 and 1-4 fts – 6 rebs (1 off) – 0 blks – 2 to – 3 pfs – 3 pts
Why in God’s name would you want that lack of effort and production on the Cs???
At best, Perk is a mediocre center helped greatly by KG’s defense and presence. We’re better off with JO (and Shaq when he returns) and Krstic as a sold back-up and JG on our bench (which would be EMPTY at SF without the trade). While I like your passion and overall analysis comments, especially re RR, I am Perked to death by every post in which you berate DA or mention Perk’s name. He is gone so please move on and concentrate on what this group of Cs is bringing every night. And Jay, please pull his image down off this a Celtic blog. How about honoring JO for his efforts vs NY???
The Cs do not miss Perk. Only you and a few others that keep bringing his name up.
Go Cs….anyone else for changing the wall????
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Perkins has shown nothing in the playoffs that makes me miss him.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Based on KP’s performance since he left the Celtics I think we are lucky to have gotten rid of him:
http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/Tough-guy-needs-to-get-tough-KENDRICK-PERKINSBIG-MAN-SUPPOSED-TO-BE-INTIMIDATOR-24795213
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Yeah, Paul, you need to let go of your near-religious Perkins worship. You’re starting to sound like a broken record and a petulant little baby. In fact, if we win the title this year, here’s a rule: you don’t get to celebrate.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
So long as JO stays healthy for the next eight weeks or so, the C’s can definitely survive without Perk.
You know who I really miss? Tony Allen. He’s made a major impact in the Memphis -Spurs series. Sure he has a low b-ball IQ but his tenaciousness is unbelievable. Nobody ever talks about him, but nobody could slow down Kobe like Allen. We don’t have that guy off the bench anymore to slow down the other team’s big scorers.
Classic Allen in Game 3: He makes a steal off a scrappy hustle play, then leads a fast break by himself against 3 defenders to force a bad shot. Okay, so that’s why they let him go, but overall, he had a great game. Take Allen off Memphis and they would definitely be losing a lot of punch.
I would live with his bad decisions in exchange for his great D and hustle plays.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
PS, I never thought I’d be saying the C’s could live without Perk. But then again, I never really thought JO would be in good health come playoff time.
KNOCK WOOD.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
We can survive without Perk even if Jermaine doesn’t stay healthy. But not having Perk hurts us a lot. JO should really be coming off the bench.
Even if trading Perkins didn’t hurt us, it was an inexcusable decision by a general manager who put a future contract dispute over the ongoing championship push of his team. No fan should EVER justify that.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@paul-Perkins is fragile, we weren’t going to be able to resign him, we got something for nothing.
Like or Dislike:
0
0