On Boston’s defense against Dwyane Wade

After playing four Chalmers-esque regular season games against the Boston Celtics, Dwyane Wade donned his smock and painted a masterpiece in Game 1. To say Wade singlehandedly killed the Celtics would be to hurt James Jones’ feelings and overlook Lebron’s contributions, but the former Marquette superstar was at his attacking best, especially while scoring 21 points in Miami’s dominant first half.
Yesterday, I praised Boston’s defense for forcing Wade into tough shots. After re-watching each of his shot attempts, I realize I gave credit where none of it was due. Instead of seeing reality, I was viewing the game through the murky window of Wade’s heroics. Yes, some of the shots Wade managed to squeeze into the bucket would have been judged a 9.0 for difficulty. But on many occasions, Boston’s defense abandoned Wade as if he were a bit player rather than one of the NBA’s top-five talents.
At their best, the Celtics are a five-stringed puppet being controlled by puppeteer Lawrence Frank (with a tip of the hat to Tom Thibodeau’s principles). They load help-side defense on one side of the floor and force Wade and superstars of his ilk into tough jump shots. At their best, nothing comes easy for opponents, especially opposing superstars, all of whom the Celtics pay supreme attention to. But yesterday was decidedly less than Boston’s best.
Wade’s tough enough to stop when the Celtics play perfect defense, never mind when they lose him like an absent-minded person might lose his car keys. The Celtics knew exactly where he was one second, and then, just like that, he was gone. On the following play, Ray Allen chases a shadow at the three-point arc while Wade cuts behind him straight to the hoop.
There’s an excuse for losing certain lesser players. But to lose Dwyane Wade takes a brain fart loud enough to wake up the neighbors. And to do it twice? Unfathomable.
It’s tough to criticize Allen after the shooting display he put on. But the Celtics need a greater attention to detail on the defensive end. Allowing Wade easy looks doesn’t merely give the Heat points, it also fuels Wade’s confidence and makes difficult shots seem a little more simple.
Of course, not every Wade bucket was a back cut resulting in a wide open layup. At other times, he beat Boston’s set defense like it wasn’t there. Here, off-ball action leaves Allen out of position, slightly trailing Wade. That’s all Wade needs to get past him to the baseline. While Allen certainly could have done a better job sliding his feet, he’s not entirely to blame for Wade’s easy bucket. Help defense never comes. Glen Davis either A) becomes preoccupied with some Lebron screening action that’s already being properly defended by Kevin Garnett, B) picks his nose, or C) daydreams of his next hot dog, and meanwhile Wade finishes the hoop and the harm without Davis even realizing what’s going on.
Repeating an earlier sentiment, Boston’s defense is predicated on five men working in unison. When one player gets beat and help doesn’t come—and against Wade and Lebron, help will be needed—the Celtics can look bad. We’re unaccustomed to such mental lapses from the guys in Green, but even the Celtics are susceptible to off days.
So far, I haven’t given the Heat enough credit. Because they surround Wade and Lebron with capable shooters, helping becomes more difficult. The Celtics can’t afford to leave Mario Chalmers, Mike Bibby, Mike Miller or James Jones because all of those players can hit outside shots. So the help has to come from the big guys. In the following possession, note how far Nenad Krstic has to come to help, just because Boston’s afraid to leave Miami’s shooters alone.
In classic Krstician fashion, he’s a day late and a dollar short. Rather than stopping Wade outside the paint, Wade’s able to waltz into Boston’s interior and make a relatively easy shot. But Miami’s ability to spread the floor with shooters forces Krstic to come a long way, making help-side defense a greater task.
What’s good about Boston’s defensive lapses against Wade is that they are correctable. The Celtics have shown the ability to rotate on a string in the past, and can certainly improve in Game 2. What they need to focus on is giving early help to Wade, forcing him into contested jumpers rather than open looks in the paint. Even yesterday, Boston at times showed the ability to execute its defensive gameplan.
In the following play, Ray gets beat initially. It’s Dwyane Wade—that happens. But Kevin Garnett has already rotated into perfect help position, so Wade takes a contested stepback jumper rather than an easy layup.
The Celtics can defend Wade better, and they can do it more consistently. If they don’t on Tuesday, Game 2 could unravel in a similar fashion to Game 1, with Boston being torn to shreds by a superstar who didn’t receive enough defensive attention.
Related posts:





I know James Jones’ absurd number of open looks contributed to the Heat win, but is there any doubt about who is Miami’s most important player? When Wade plays well and is the focal point of the offense, the Heat are probably unbeatable. That being said, the Celts played almost as bad they could play and Heat played as good as they could play. I think the Heat are in trouble.
http://theresastatforthat.blogspot.com/…nt-player.html
Reply ›
Like or Dislike:
0
0
As I said, I’m done commenting here. To hell with your tiddleywink comment rules. But in parting, I want to say that I have enjoyed your writing, when you aren’t defending The Trade with milktoast criticism of it, and that I still think that the Celtics will take this series, starting with game 2.
I’m still mad at Doc. He had a week to prepare this team, and yet they came into this game, a game they basically knew was coming all season long, unprepared mentally and without an adequate gameplan. Clearly they wanted to establish Rondo in the low post early, and when that didn’t work out, they didn’t really seem to have much of a backup plan.
Also, I cannot believe that Doc is STILL yapping about Shaq. Who the hell cares about Shaq? If he helps us, fine, if not, fine. If we win, we win because of the Big Four rising to the occasion, especially Rondo. Doc should refuse to continue to feed the ongoing media frenzy about Shaq. We do NOT need this ongoing distraction, and what message does it send to the rest of the team when Doc feeds into the focus on Shaq? It needs to stop.
The Heat played about as well as they can play yesterday, and the Celtics played about as badly as they can play, and the result was a 9 point loss for us. That was basically just enough to get the Celtics’ attention. If I were the Heat, I’d be feeling like I just slugged a lion. They know that a storm is headed their way.
I was pretty sure I felt a victory coming for the Cs this weekend. I guess I was just a couple of days off. Our guys are gonna come roaring back, and Rondo most of all. I still think that this is going to be Rondo’ s breakout series as a superstar. He has a choice to make. He can either be intimidated by the likes of Bibby and Lebron, or he can rise to the challenge. I don’t think there is any question about which direction our Rajon is going to go in. The ‘Do will flo.
We have a series to win and a destiny to meet. Best of luck to the Celtics and to you all.
And good luck, Perk! Mr. Randolph thinks he owns you. I’m thinking that he probably doesn’t. What do you think?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Paul, I don’t want you to leave. I just don’t want any of our commenters aiming insults at each other. I would love for you to continue sharing your opinions here. I actually loved that you always commented.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
paul…stick around and support Jay’s blog, the Cs but not the trade (just kidding as I know you can’t help yourself). Winning it all may change that though??? Your analyses are quite good and I like the banter even though the Perk stuff is too much. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
P.S. But I do want the C-Town wall changed and maybe even you could support that? RR should be dunking to avoid the blocks on his lay-ups. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0