Chris Paul deal called off by NBA; Celtics acquire Keyon Dooling

The Celtics are going to announce the acquisition of veteran point guard Keyon Dooling from the Milwaukee Bucks on Friday, the first day of training camp and trades can become official, according to a league source.
The deal is expected to include a second-round draft pick headed to Milwaukee and it gives the Celtics a veteran backup point guard behind Rajon Rondo, who remains a Celtic after Chris Paul was dealt to the Los Angeles Lakers. The deal is somewhat complicated because the Celtics are over the salary cap.
I’m glad the Chris Paul trade was called off. Not just because the league’s (outrageously unpredictable and kooky) decision saved the world from eight consecutive LA-Miami NBA Finals, but also because we won’t view Keyon Dooling as a punchline anymore.
Now that Dooling is no longer a consolation prize Danny Ainge settled on after hunting down Paul with the ferocity of a tiger that hasn’t eaten in three weeks, we can see the acquisition for what it really is: a sneaky-good maneuver by Ainge.
Dooling will never be considered a superstar. He shot less than 40 percent during each of the last two seasons. He’s a decent three-point shooter (34.5 percent, a tick more than one make per game), but not a great one. He won’t light the world on fire with court vision, and nothing about his game makes basketball purists want to do break down and do the macarena. But here’s the catch:
Dooling led the Bucks in on-court/off-court differential last season. He led the New Jersey Nets in the same statistic the year before. If Jeff Green is an anti-gravitational force who looks talented while making his teams play worse whenever he steps on the court, Dooling is the opposite. The best guess for Dooling’s weird (and recent: the trend only dates back the last two seasons) tendency of improving his teams is that his defensive abilities are game-changing. Two seasons ago, New Jersey’s defense was 10.7 points per 100 possessions better when Dooling played. Last year, Milwaukee’s defense was 3.0 points better with Dooling on the court. He stops his own man, too: Dooling’s opponents had a well-below-average PER each of the past two seasons.
Danny Ainge needs to fill seven spots. He has no cash with which to do it. Dooling is a veteran who can contribute, and Ainge acquired him for a second-round pick. I’d say that’s a coup.
P.S. — Wait. The Celtics needed to upgrade their offense, not their defense? And Dooling shot 39.7 percent last season and 39.8 percent the season before? Doh.
P.P.S. — Spending a second-round pick to acquire a combo guard can’t be a good sign regarding Boston’s confidence in Avery Bradley. Maybe he should ask to stay at Doc’s house during training camp and be sure to do all the household chores this time around?
Related posts:
- Boston Celtics leading Chris Paul trade race?
- Chris Paul still very much in Danny Ainge’s crosshairs
- Chris Paul wouldn’t sign extension with Boston Celtics, according to a report
- Chris Paul down to Boston Celtics as only realistic trade destination?
- Rajon Rondo trade rumors: Is Dwight Howard part of the Boston Celtics’ Chris Paul plan?





Does this mean D West is going somewhere?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I hope not.
Like or Dislike:
0
1
Results of today’s bizarre ‘As The NBA Turns’ episode…
1. The Lakers just got better because the trade was rescinded. How so? Because now they still have their frontline of Gasol/Odom that was headed out of town. Yes CP3 would have improved their backcourt but it would also have decimated their front-court. Those 8-9 LA/Miami Finals are more a possibility now Jay.
2. CP3 can wait until the next off season, become a FA and still sign with the Lakers (even if traded somewhere else). Maybe not at max to start but for a year and then the Lakers have Bird ‘rights’ and can sign him to a max…and they keep Gasol/Odom or some better combination (leverage is a better word here) to get Howard. Either way the league and it’s idiotic owners can still lose this and NO could potentially end up with nothing for CP3. Thereby making the smaller NO market even worse off. Brilliant move Stern.
3. The Cs just sent a major message to Bradley that he is not in their plans by grabbing an over-the-hill PG that plays defense and has limited offense after many years in the league as opposed to giving Bradley a chance to improve with real playing time. In my humble opinion this move SUCKS and proves the Cs are not interested in developing draft picks; especially ones that already excel at playing defense which just happens to be why most young players struggle to get playing time because they can’t defend.
Celtic logic at it’s worst in action here and now I am leaning paul’s way that DA is GM challenged.
What a day and what brilliance will tomorrow bring? I almost don’t even want to know based on the asinine move tonight. Go Cs…I think!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
P.S. Take a look at Dooling’s stats, especially the last 5 games played last year. Toss the last two out as he will never get that many minutes (unless RR is injured) and look at the first 3 games which will be the kind of time he gets with the Cs. Also look at the 3 opponents and ask yourself …this is our new back-up??? I’d prefer Bradley. Go Cs..
http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/209/keyon-dooling
Like or Dislike:
0
0
The Dooling trade is the Danny I like. It’s not that I’m against blockbuster trades in principle. The gathering of the Big Three shows that there is a time for such doings. BUT NOT ALL THE TIME. Has there ever been a considerable period of time when Ainge hasn’t been considering some blockbuster move? It’s a sickness with him. And Jeez, now he can spend weeks to months gnawing at the same Trade-for-Paul bone. Just what he and we needed. Brother. The year just got a lot longer.
That said, I take your point, James, about Bradley. What does this say about the team’s commitment to Bradley, and by that token, about their commitment to building through the draft? Just as I’m not in principle against well-thought-out and really needed (eg, ‘upgrading’ a position where you really need it, as opposed to one where you conspicuously don’t really need it) Big Trades, I’m not a draft purist. But I do like to see the old-fashioned idea of drafting and developing players taken a bit seriously. Bradley plays NBA level defense. Let’s work on getting his offensive play up a notch or two.
I mean, I like what Jay says about Dooley here, and I like the idea of low profile high value moves, but why have we been spending the entire off season seemingly trying push our current point guards off the back of the train?
Like or Dislike:
0
0