Hollinger: Blame KG

Kevin Garnett has rarely dunked the basketball this season, but he caught a pass in the middle of the lane during last night’s second half and the rim looked to be his next foe. Two or three years ago, maybe even last season, Garnett would have risen into the stratosphere, cocked his arms back, ripped a two-handed dunk through the hoop and then beat his chest like a drum while spewing profanity for the next few seconds.
But last night, Garnett lofted a giant killer over the outstretched arms of Serge Ibaka. The shot went in, and in a way it was beautiful, a seven-footer with the finesse of a point guard, lofting a tear drop that scrape the retired numbers before falling into the hoop. But the shot was also the latest evidence that Garnett simply doesn’t have the power or explosion we’ve come to expect, doesn’t have the lift to take advantage of players he once abused.
After the game, John Hollinger said we can’t blame Kendrick Perkins for the Boston debacle that has now resulted in five straight losses, nor can we blame Danny Ainge. One person should shoulder the weight of blame, and he’s the same person noted for changing Boston’s culture and hanging a 17th championship banner in TD Garden. (ESPN)
And that, in a nutshell, is the story behind the 2011-12 Celtics. Garnett, the linchpin of one of the best defensive teams in NBA history over the past four seasons, can’t get off the ground, and it’s affecting his game at every level. Monday night he used 25 possessions to produce 12 points, with several close-in shots providing particularly poignant reminders. One close-in flip that would have been a dunk two years ago went in, but another was instead rejected by Serge Ibaka.
Last season, Garnett made a staggering impact defensively. Boston gave up 6.19 fewer points per 100 possessions with him on the court than off it, and the Celtics already were among the league’s best defensive teams without him. According to basketballvalue.com, only one player — Chicago’s Ronnie Brewer — had opponents score less when he was on the court than Garnett’s 97.84 points per 100 possessions.
Kevin Garnett’s leaping ability, and impact on D, are starting to wane.
This season, Garnett is nowhere to be found on that leaderboard; Boston gives up the same amount whether he’s on the court or off it, even though his replacement is normally the defensive suspect Brandon Bass.
There’s just no power to Garnett’s game anymore. Every move he makes is ginger. He drop steps in the low post and loses balance before lofting an ugly fade away jumper. He lofts runners over Serge Ibaka. He taps rebounds with one hand because he can’t secure them with two. Maybe even more telling than any other play last night, Garnett was blocked on a jump shot last night by Nick Collison. Garnett NEVER used to get his jump shots blocked, but now Collison — not a bad player by any means, but certainly not an elite athlete — is capable of rejecting Garnett’s once-untouchable fade away.
I’m one of Garnett’s biggest fans. He’s one of the greatest two-way players ever. He remains as responsible or more responsible for Boston’s latest championship than anybody. His name will always be one I remember fondly. But the drop he’s taken from May until now is incredible, and it kills me to admit that Hollinger’s right.
There are other problems in Boston, but KG’s precipitous fall hurts them in every aspect.
Related posts:





No. Wrong. I’m so sick of how desperate the prostitute ‘journalists’ are to blame everyone but Danny. I’m not going to even argue about The Trade. You, Jay, and James, and Hollinger for sure have chosen to be intellectual prostitutes, buying and selling the company line even though it is patently a lie.
OF COURSE KG IS GETTING OLDER. You know he has been getting older for a while. You also KNOW that what compensated for this was team cohesion, toughness, having a young/strong/tough frontline guy like Perk to play with, and above all, the Rise of Rondo. We had ways of compensating for the aging of the Big Three, especially Garnett. Those ways are gone now.
Trading Perk wrecked the team’s cohesion and took away the frontline partner who helped KG stay relevant longer. It also robbed Rondo of a fellow young person in the lineup. NOW THE WHOLE LINEUP IS MADE OF OLD PLAYERS, OR YOUNG ONES WHO HAVE NO STANDING, AND RONDO. The result is that the team has chosen to once again run the Big Three offense with no changes whatsoever designed to facilitate Rondo’s talents.
So now the Big Three are exposed. Perk is gone. Rondo is in a permanent funk. The fact that they aren’t the superstars they once were is patently obvious now. Oh sure, they’ll all have big games at times. They are still formerly great players with considerable fire left. EVEN JO CAN MANAGE A BIG GAME AT TIMES.
But people, it isn’t 2008 anymore. Stop being so damn stupid about this. It really makes me physically sick that ALL OF YOU continue to buy into the “it’s still 2008″ delusion. You would rather rip Perk and rip Rondo than acknowledge that this team has taken a very wrong turn and NO ONE IS CALLING THEM ON IT.
KG can still be relevant. But he needs to adapt. He is trying to. I think Allen is willing also. It’s Doc and Paul who don’t want to adapt. And the media and fans coddle them in this delusional endeavor to pretend that half a decade hasn’t passed since the glory days. Never in Celtics history has a team been so willfully delusional.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
17
2
Preach on Paul. You are calling it like everyone should be seeing it. Drop everything from last year’s playbook and start the rebuilding process now.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
PREACH ON BROTHER PREACH ON!!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Paul, you’re probably a really nice guy in person but I can barely read your posts anymore. None of us has any stake in perpetuating some sort of Legend for Danny Ainge. We just happen to disagree with you that he and Perk are the core issues with this team. You bring themes like betrayal and loyalty into the conversation and it’s just completely unnecessary. Cool down for Christ’s sake.
Like or Dislike:
3
2
What you need to understand, Brad, is that when you buy into lies, which you should know are lies, you become part of the system that perpetuates them.
When you refuse to use your native ability for critical thinking, you betray yourself and others.
Most of us do this because we want to feel that we belong. We feel safer when think what we are told to think. But it’s actually bad for us.
Like or Dislike:
2
2
You’re joking, right? Have you been watching 911 conspiracy videos? Chill.
Like or Dislike:
1
2
Please, let’s stop with the blame Danny stuff.
If you spent any time reading about Perk’s contract and Celtics salary cap limitations and the NBA free agency procedures you would understand that there was no way the Celtics were going to be able to sign Perk with open market dynamics.
Get your facts straight first, though I admit the media hasn’t done a very good job at explaining this to Celtic fans who would rather whine than think about the cap realities.
If the Celtics WOULD have signed Perk, they would have effectively been building their team cap-wise on Perk and not on the new guys they will be able to sign next year without restrictions. Even though you don’t know who they will be, I can guarantee you that they will be better than Perk.
And if you want to “what if” last years playoffs, do you really think they were going anywhere with Rondo hurting, Baby crying, and no real backup for Perk anyway. Perk probably would have been vilified for something not his fault,just like you’re vilifying Danny.
Blame David Stern, blame owner and/or player greed, or blame the fans for not wanted to pay the ticket prices they’d have to pay without a cap. But if you want Danny for doing the best he can to play by the cards/rules he was dealt is just plain ignorant. And calling journalists “prostitutes” for not rubbing your nose into economic details that you clearly aren’t interested in hearing hardly seems fair. I rarely visit Bleacher Report anymore because it’s sloppy, fact free reporting and comments like yours that makes too frustrating. And I see that I’m hardly the only one that feels that way.
Like or Dislike:
2
2
At this point I think Paul is a joke-poster/troll. There’s no way he means what he says, or at least means it as emphatically as he says it.
You’re right Jack, the fans and he media have chosen not to pay attention to the open market dynamics that forced Ainge into trading Perk. They never have and it’s stupid.
Could Ainge have gotten more back to for Perk? Once again, fans overestimate a favorite player’s value on the open market. Perk wasn’t necessarily as coveted in the rest of the NBA as he as in Boston. Should we have kept him at least until the end of the season to have the best chance to the win the title? Last year?! Even last year Perk wouldn’t have made the difference, and he got injured again, and his stats aren’t anywhere near the legend that people like Paul want to afford him. Then we’d have nothing. Which is where we are but it’s intellectually dishonest to say that green being out for a year with a heart condition proves that point.
Ainge isn’t some evil Ming the Merciless trying to pull the wool over our eyes so that he can pump more oil out of the Middle East in order to perpetuate out rabid consumerist culture (see what I’m doing here Paul?). Ainge is a good GM (and an occasionally great GM) that has to juggle the present and the future and think about several scenarios at once in order to put the best team possible on the floor today while also having the best chance to put a great team on the floor tomorrow, who is also at the mercy of the open market.
Perk’s gone and there was never going to be any way around it because he wanted too much money for what he was worth and our issues ran far deeper and were things he couldn’t fix. Early last year the NBA world saw Boston as the title favorite but I think Ainge knew even with Perk our issues (rebounding and scoring late in games) were already running far deeper than one man.
Like or Dislike:
0
1
Stats. Stats. Stats…
“Even last year Perk wouldn’t have made the difference, and he got injured again, and his stats aren’t anywhere near the legend that people like Paul want to afford him.”
It was NEVER about stats with Perk. it’s so disingenuous to use stats to support your “Perk wasn’t worth it argument.” While I understand your point about the open market and what he was worth to other teams and having to build on Perk had we retained him- this team WAS BETTER with Perk no matter how you slice it. NO ONE has ever afforded him stats or imagined stats that weren’t there. Intangibles. Yeah you “stat guys” love to dismisss them as not existing but the reality is they do. Brotherhood, trust on the court exist. Clogging the lanes exists. Setting a damn hard screen for Ray get open exists. And THAT is what Perk excelled at. Ray, Paul, even KG benefitted from Perk’s ability to be the enforcer and set those screen effectively. Even Rondo benefitted from having Perk there, he got to the basket easier. JO isn’t setting a screen worth a damn.
I understand your point, but don’t use BS and willfully neglect facts and talk about stats. It was NEVER about stats. If it was all about stats Chris Paul or LeBron would have rings.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Gotta disagree with you re the stats JRR as stats do tell the negative counterbalance to those other ‘good’ areas that Perk excelled at. The fact is this team was better with Shaq and JO as the centers at the start of last season as Shaq was a better rebounder and offensive player and I do believe he knew how and did set picks and clog the middle. The problem with you beat on us stats guys is like paul, you live in the hindsight world of non-reality. That would be like me living in the ‘what-if’ world…neither world works. The reality is Shaq and JO got injured. Perk got traded for his perceived exorbitant salary demands and because we had two centers BETER than Perk in front of him. Perk was not going to replace Shaq in the starting line-up when healthy (Cs were something like 23-3 with Shaq starting and were considered the team to beat). And you never mention, or maybe you don’t understand, how KG’s defense helped Perk. Watch Perk now with a younger and better OKC team and his stats are declining even though there’s better talent. His TOs and PFs about equal his rebounding efficiency so the 7 pts he gets a night are the only bonus OKC is getting other than a slow slug in the middle (which many times prevented RR from driving to the hoop because Perk couldn’t get out of the way). Cry me another river over Perk all you want and buddy up with paul, but we’re a better team without Perk and having Jeff Green. the Cs had to make a move as there was no back-up for PP…remember that??? So the trade happened but you guys will likely be bitching until the end of the decade. Sorry but stats are proving Perk was only a mediocre center at best. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
1
Hollinger is right, it does fall somewhat on Garnett’s shoulders because without a consistent center, he’s the one who needs to anchor the defense. But to BLAME KG? No, it’s not his fault that Father Time caught up to him. I’ve been watching since 2000 & never really seen age creep on a player (Because the C’s were pretty much always young & inexperienced) so I guess I’m taking it harsh but I realize that he just can’t do it anymore. Incredibly painfull to see from my favorite player of all time who would rise up & destroy the rim with a defender questioning himself for even thinking of attempting to defend a dunk from KG to a player who can’t outjump Joel Anthony. It’s tough but I’m gonna try & enjoy the Big 3 as much as I can this season because it seems like this is it.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
KG is perfectly capable of adjusting. In my view, Doc and Paul are the ones who are refusing to adjust. They are trying to pretend that it’s still 2008. It just isn’t.
Like or Dislike:
1
2
BTW … Garnett recorded a whopping 40% Usg rate last night … way too high for a player who prides himself on being efficient. I’ve been keenly aware of the way he is finessing each possession. That finger roll certainly raised an eyebrow and the alley oop ( a signature bread and butter play no longer synonymous with his arsenal) was accidentally converted. But could anyone have predicted this kind of dramatic, precipitous drop from last season? More importantly, wouldn’t this palpable slippage be easier to mask if Danny would have used free agent money to procure players in the mold of a Collision or Batum instead of Sheed, JO and Shaq? Hindsight is 20/20, but Danny drafted poorly in conjunction with free agent moves that have decimated the front court.
Like or Dislike:
2
1
Garnett still has the capability to impact a game, however since his knee injury he has not been the same. After 15 years of being down in the trenches, you can’t expect much more. Doc (I hope he reads this), needs to focus on constant rotation of all players on this years team. Every time I watch a game, I see the Big 3 playing most of the minutes. I feel he relies on them too much when others on the team need to step up and contribute or at least try. Doc should play them no matter what and at this point he hasn’t got much choice, unless he wants to go 4-9. Forget this garbage about wrapping Avery, JaJuan, Steimsma and Moore in cotton wool. The less you play your guys, the less confidence they have. Every man on the roster should get a fair share and just tinker around with your line up. Sometimes you could have KG, J O Neal and Steisma in the front line. Tell me that isn’t daunting for players trying to run the lane? DOC PLEASE MIX IT UP AND ROTATE YOUR PLAYERS. C’MON C’S, ONE GAME AT A TIME.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
ABSOLUTELY. Finally the voices are being heard!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
What do you expect? Kevin Garnett is over the hill. It was bound to happen sooner or later. Ainge shipping Perk for virtually nothing has actually sped up the process.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
Remember, the NBA season is very long, things will turn around. The Patriots, though, are about to win another Super Bowl, and the Parade Route has been released to http://www.wickedimproper.com
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Rotation is key to turning this team around. Place the Captain on the bench, Doc. Bring out your young thunder so they can gain the confidence from the experience captured by PLAYING ON THE FLOOR. I don’t care at this point who the Celtics are playing against, but Doc has the right players, they just aren’t getting the minutes. THIS ISN’T 2008 or even 2011 anymore so wake up and strengthen the great players you have!
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Someone suggested making Pierce sixth man. That may be a good idea, as he does not seem to be willing to adapt to a Rondo led team.
Like or Dislike:
2
1
at one point tey were very deep at center perk, the 2 O’Neals and KG and if need be Big Baby DA ships off Perk, and BB and you are left with a shot first team, not inside presence ….. You when by going inside first and then kick outs …. glad for Perk the THUNDER IS A FORCE …. the C’s will be OK but its definitively ramp up time….
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Most people don’t understand the Perk trade. Here is how I saw it:
1. Perk and Shaq were not going to be good together. Neither would be happy backing up the other so one of them had to go.
2. Shaq had a contract and was untradable. Plus, he looked good in the first half of the season. The expectation was that JO would be able to contribute in the backup role.
3. Perk wasn’t going to get any better and he slowed the team down. Ainge wanted the Celtics to become more athletic and Perk is the wrong body type. Plus, Perk was going to be a free agent and likely demand more than the Celtics were willing to pay.
3. Trading Perk gets you Jeff Green who has the kind of athleticism that the Celtics covet.
4. So if Shaq stays healthy and JO can play, then the trade is brilliant. But it didn’t work out that way. Was Ainge being too optimistic about Shaq? Perhaps, but it was still a smart gamble knowing what he knew at the time.
Like or Dislike:
0
1
See what I mean about total, despicable BS? Tomb knows that Shaq was out for the season when Perk came back. Tomb also knows that you don’t get rid of your longterm center because a one-year rental doesn’t like him. Tomb also knows that even if you wanted to switch from Perk to Green, you don’t do it with a month to go in the season when you are hot in a championship chase and it leaves you with no center. Tomb also knows that Ainge was plainly lying about Shaq, and we all knew this at the time, and SHAQ HAS SINCE CONFIRMED THIS.
No Tomb, James, and whoever, i have no respect AT ALL for your lies about The Trade. You are shilling for Danny. Period. I bet you are on the payroll. Really. I bet you are. How hard would it be for Danny to tell some of the drones in his office to post crap like this. Marc would do it. Are you Marc, Tomb? Whoever you are, you know that you are repeating lies.
Like or Dislike:
2
3
Look up ad hominem arguments in Wikipedia. You might learn how foolish you appear to others. I believe that Tomb has better things to do with his life than to post LIES (?!!??!) to benefit Danny’s public perception as you suggest.
Like or Dislike:
0
1
Oh God, where do I start? Tomb…you are dead-on. As was Jack and my man Brad (in LA)… That said, paul like to live in a world of hindsight and non-reality. The reality is that Perk was not the center when traded and was actually the 3rd center behind Shaq and JO. Injuries happen and they even cost us in 2010 when Perk got injured so to say Shaq was “never coming back” is absurd. Twist it however you want paul but the consensus here is that Perk priced himself out of being a Celtic and DA needed his contract to solidify a very weak bench. Now as a “shill” for DA, hold on ….this just in… DA just called me and said “thanks for supporting him”. How cool is that??? So I will continue to sing praise to DA because he got us #18, would have gotten us #19 if KG wasn’t injured, would have gotten us #20 if Perk had not been injured or the f’in Laker refs controlling the series and especially that last game. So by my hindsight count paul…Da would have brought us 4 titles not just the one he did bring. See how far fetched talking about ‘what ifs” is???? As for KG and this post’s topic, I believe KG is injured but not enough to sit. The explosiveness isn’t there and you just don’t lose that in less than 6 months since the end of last season. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
1
Oops, missed last year with #21 with the injuries to Shaq & JO. We were the best team until the injuries hit again. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
KG is perfectly capable of adapting to his aging body. The question is whether Doc is willing to adapt. Doc still wants to run the 2008 offense. That offense was designed to suit a situation that doesn’t exist anymore. We had three of the best jumpshooters in history, and our offense was designed to optimize their abilities. One could almost call it a modified triangle offense, though not technically. IT’S FIVE YEARS LATER!!! We have a different situation. Our best player is a slashing pg who loves to break down defenses. The Big Three can adapt to this, but only if Doc and Paul are willing. There is no doubt that KG can adapt. Ray ray can for sure. But if Doc won’t and Paul won’t, then we have an impossible situation.
Like or Dislike:
0
1
HOnestly it’s a natural cycle teams get to good and as the players get older there skills decline they get worst as a team its happened to all the best teams the celtics bulls lakers blazers hawk
All the classically amazing team have had to deal with this as there stars fade its no ones fault seriously and Paul you need to relax what are you on guy.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
HOnestly it’s a natural cycle teams get to good and as the players get older there skills decline they get worst as a team its happened to all the best teams the celtics bulls lakers blazers hawk
All the classically amazing team have had to deal with this as there stars fade its no ones fault seriously and Paul you need to relax what are you on guy.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
[...] Hollinger: Blame KG | Celtics Town | Boston Celtics blog | Celtics newsBy Jay KingKevin Garnett has rarely dunked the basketball this season, but he caught a pass in the middle of the lane during last night's second half and the rim looked to be his next foe. … And that, in a nutshell, is the story behind the 2011-12 Celtics. …Celtics Town | Boston Celtics… [...]
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Incredible. We haven’t even played 10 hours of basketball and there is a rat infestation. Collectively, you should all be downright ashamed of yourselves and never post here again.
I fn hate, despise this attitude of if Cs are not winning they’re done.
Have been hearing it for the last 4 years – heck these posts have been thrown around since KG arrived in Boston.
How about everyone just shuts the hell up and watches the season first, then decides on who’s done and who’s not.
There’s just been a god-darn 6 month lockout and we’ve added 30 new faces AND our defensive numbers are ALREADY as good as last year!!!
Our offense will be a thing of beauty once everyone has bought in. 34′s been bloody injured for half the games after not playing for 6 months! I’d love to see Durant’s numbers after stepping into an NBA game with a recent injury and lack of game time.
KG remains, without any doubt, the league’s true defensive MVP – a powerhouse that demands opposing offenses to bring their best or dont come at all. With each game he’s regaining the step that he lost in the long break – soon you’ll begin to realize that nothing’s changed as far as our defensive efficiency.
The offense is a work in progress, that relies on team chemistry, which the new guys are only now beginning to buy into.
Just wait til 34 is feeling 100% and he’s had some game time…
Ray’s 3 is maturing like a fine wine, in fact this season will be his career’s finest performance yet, pay close attention!
And with the way Rondo is coming along, the Cs will be looking for a broom these playoffs, which are not far away at all (a bonus in itself).
Oh and one final (and probably scariest) thing for Cs opponents – most of these losses have been suffered in clutch-time.
Now go on, go and do whatever it is that you do and strap yourself in for banner 18. Go Cs!
Like or Dislike:
0
0