• Home
  • About Celtics Town
  • Contact Us
  • NBA Blog Links
  • Privacy Policy

Celtics 91, Knicks 89: Not pretty, but well-earned

A report from the New York Daily News claimed that Mike D’Antoni would be fired if his Knicks did not beat the Celtics on Friday night.

Down two points, perhaps coaching the final timeout of his Knicks career, D’Antoni combed his mustache, prayed for the ghost of Steve Nash to come save him and looked at Carmelo Anthony and Amare, two of the NBA’s most dangerous scorers. He then tapped on his right arm for the relief pitcher, a 6-foot-10 former Marquette Golden Eagle who is averaging just 3.7 points this season and had yet to play a single second Friday night.

Steve Novak came off a screen, the rest of the Knicks seemed really confused, Landry Fields passed to Novak in the corner, and if D’Antoni’s Knicks tenure really does end after that — a leaning, fade-away three from a perfectly cold 10th man — there is no more fitting end to a befuddling era of un-kept promises.

The Knicks led by ten points in the third quarter; at that point, it did not look like their chances would ever come down to a Novak prayer. But the Celtics — who did not ever hit their offensive stride, even during their comeback and subsequent seizing of the lead — began to work harder. Chris Wilcox fought for balls he had no business snatching. Paul Pierce followed his missed shots and chased them into the back court to save possessions. Rajon Rondo squirreled his way underneath, keeping possessions alive using sheer will, and the rest of the Boston cast fought like hell even while the rim tightened its dress code and allowed very few shots to pass through the cylinder.

The game slowed to a defensive battle, which surely favored the Celtics, and it helped that the Celtics had Pierce and the scorching right hand of Walter Ray Allen on their side. But this game easily could have gone the other way. Iman Shumpert missed a wide open three, the Celtics followed with a shot clock violation (which was *thisclose* from being an absurd Pierce three), Landry Fields missed a decent look from the corner partially due to a tight Garnett contest, Pierce missed one of two free throws, and then the Novak substitution happened.

If you revisit the list of plays I just created, you’ll see that neither Anthony or Stoudemire took a shot in the final minute for New York. The Celtics were quite set on making other players hurt them; though Tyson Chandler found a few easy looks in the fourth quarter, New York’s fourth and fifth options could not take advantage of their opportunities.

The most important takeaway from Boston’s win? The regular season seems to matter again to the Beantown Boys. The Celtics are playing with playoff intensity on a nightly basis. They are thriving even when they don’t bring their finest jump shots. They beat the Knicks due to a simple mix of hard work and good fortune — luck had something to do with it, but mostly, the Celtics created their own luck. A few of the C’s (I’m looking at you, Wilcox) should have some nice floor burns to show for their efforts.

Rajon Rondo lacked offensive aggression and dropped a few passes. I could be projecting, but it looked like his wrist still bothered him, at least slightly. Yet there he was, bouncing around like a pinball, stealing the ball from Shumpert on the baseline and forcing a foul in the resulting skirmish. There he was, swooping underneath Fields, perhaps knocking the ball of Fields’ hand (or perhaps receiving a golden gift from the referees). Either way, bad call or not, the extra possession ended with a Ray Allen made three and a D’Antoni technical foul.

A little while later, Pierce hit a miracle three-pointer at or after the shot clock buzzer which would have given Boston a four-point lead with 16 seconds left. The refs convened and decided the shot did not count; it must have been touching Pierce’s fingernails when the shot clock ran out. Pierce was not particularly taken to the decision to wave off his shot:

But the game came down to what it rightfully should have — New York was given two chances to win the game while Boston dug its toes into the parquet floor. Sixteen seconds later, the Celtics had preserved a victory they had not just earned, but fought for.

Related posts:

  1. The Knickerbockers, again relevant, make Celtics-Knicks fun — even if it’s not a rivalry
  2. Celtics-Knicks Game One: Two exploitations you may not have noticed
  3. Celtics-Knicks playoff schedule announced
  4. Celtics play JV team, lose to Wizards; Knicks await in playoffs
  5. Game Preview: Boston Celtics host New York Knicks

categories Celtics Blog | Jay King | February 3, 2012

27 Responses to “Celtics 91, Knicks 89: Not pretty, but well-earned”

  1. James says:
    February 4, 2012 at 12:04 am

    Too bad the Cs live on the belief that light-switching is preferable to showing up and giving the effort they gave in the 3rd and 4th qtrs from the start of the game. Could have won this by at least 10 pts + if they hustled and rebounded like they did when pressed and facing another loss. Why does it take facing losing to wake them up and have them give 100%+ effort as opposed to coasting like they did in the first half? OMG, PP actually fought for an offensive rebound and hustled until he almost cost them the game by not hustling after RR made a questionable pass to him and PP gave up after being out hustled and the steal got the Knicks to one right before PP’s disallowed 3. Why does he settle for jumpers all night but then force it inside and make great plays when the game is on the line? I am so frustrated by his play. Of his 33 mins he hustled for about 4 mins but those 4 mins helped change the game along with CW who had 4 rebs…all offensive. Bradley was sensational too. Offense was terrible until the 3rd and RA only had 4 shots to that point but PP was firing them up like there was no tomorrow. Cs had 5 fast-break pts after two qtrs and none in the 2nd half. Maybe RR was rusty but he played great in the 4 qtr. If the Cs ever learned to rebound (-8 when things were at the worst and flip the switch) from the start of the game then they wouldn’t have to scramble to win games they should easily win. Yes, it’s another win and some very good things happened late but come-on…they cannot be happy with that effort. And I wish Doc would shut up about ‘rhythm’ and actually, just once please Doc, mention rebounding when he’s wired and they replay his huddle comments. Kind of like PP following his missed 3-pt shot and rebounding the ball in the back court. Miracles happen and maybe Doc will get these guys to play hard 48 mins and not just the last 18 or so. Go Cs…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

    • paul says:
      February 4, 2012 at 12:19 am

      On that play where Rondo made a bad pass to Pierce and he lost it to Fields for the easy basket, I wondered why Rondo didn’t pursue the play. That was one play where Rondo should have hustled more, not just Pierce.

      You make a lot of good comments, James, but Doc was spot on about the rhythm. They were out of sync. That was the main problem. And I think they make a lot of excuses for playing badly under Rondo’s lead. There’s really no call for the way they seemed to wait for Bradley to come in before putting some real energy out there

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • James says:
        February 4, 2012 at 3:08 am

        RR didn’t hustle because PP was in the back court with the other player and then gave up. RR was too far away and PP should have at least fouled the player instead of giving up a breakaway layup. If the Cs ever show up for the full 48 mins and hustle and rebound like they did in the last 19 mins then there would be no mention of them being in sync. They stand around too much as evidenced by their measly 5 fast break pts. No rebounding leads to zero fast breaks. And for God sakes why can’t they get between their man and the basket??? How may f’in layups did we give up or shots from 3-5 ft? I’m not impressed with the 2-pt win but I’ll take it. Go Cs…play 48 mins next time!

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

        • paul says:
          February 4, 2012 at 11:21 pm

          That one play was very disturbing. There were a couple of other plays where Rondo didn’t close on a player who had an open shot. I’m thinking that maybe he felt that his conditioning was off, which is a pretty valid excuse, but in general I’d like to see Doc play him in shorter stints with short breathers.

          The team seemed out of sync most of the night. I think Rondo did a good job of buying into the Honey Badger defense, but I think the team did a terrible job of buying into Rondo, and I don’t think Doc should let them off the hook for that. You don’t have to like the guy to recognize that he is you best player and to give your best while he is on the court.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • len says:
      February 4, 2012 at 1:26 am

      Mmmm PP contributed 30 points, 8 rebounds, 5 assists, 1 block and he only tried for 4 minutes. Amazing!

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • James says:
        February 4, 2012 at 3:00 am

        Did you watch the game? He was 8-21 and many of those shots were extremely ill-timed and just ‘settling’ and taking 3s like that’s all he could shoot (4-10 on 3s). One glaring example was when the Knicks got their first 10-pt lead and PP immediately took a 3 and missed while leaving at least 15 more secs on the clock. Luckily the knicks missed their next shot and the Cs were able to battle back. If you think going 8-21 and 4-10 in 3s and not hustling on the RR pass play is quality effort then you have a much different idea of what is “amazing”. Watch him next game and concentrate only on him, especially when he does not have the ball, and you’ll see out out of the game he is. His offensive rebounding sucks and he constantly fires up 3s and NEVER follows (although he did tonight and guess what he got the reb). Just because he got 30 pts doesn’t mean he had a good game. And although he was tagged with only 3 TOs he had many terrible passes and had the ball stolen from him several times and made some horrendous passes and most at the worst times. 30 pts and 7 rebs were great but how many of those missed baskets and other errors contributed to a measly 2 pt win over a team with no bench and playing a back-to-back??? Go Cs…

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • paul says:
        February 4, 2012 at 11:23 pm

        Aren’t you missing the point? If Pierce had tried harder earlier, he might have ended up with fewer hero stats, but an easier win.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. paul says:
    February 4, 2012 at 12:08 am

    This was really a thrilling win. The Celtics had no right to win this game. The other team was playing much better, and seemed to want it more, and the Cs were out of sync. But they gutted it out. But Rondo MUST attack more on offense, bum wrist or no bum wrist.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. jasonZ says:
    February 4, 2012 at 12:37 am

    I like how James always blow the C’s up for their mistakes and ends his post with ‘Go Cs…’

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • James says:
      February 4, 2012 at 2:50 am

      I just expect them, and am waiting for them, to show up every night, rebound better, hustle for the whole game and give 100%+ effort all the time…instead of coasting and expecting to win without having to actually battle and earn it. They have the talent to win it all no matter what all the pundits say as their bench is far better and deeper, but damn it they have to want it. I just expect them to play as hard as they used to back in 2008 when they showed up every night and proved they were willing to give their all to win. While I know they are older they just don’t play with the passion I think 4 HOFs should give. Go Cs…I love’em and just want them to compete as they can win it all.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • paul says:
      February 4, 2012 at 11:25 pm

      So you think that a true fan doesn’t criticize his team?

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Martin says:
    February 4, 2012 at 1:07 am

    We like coming here for all things Celtics. Always good write ups. We’re proud to be the only Boston blog BiBi Jones mentioned during her stay. Http://www.wickedimproper.com

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  5. CELTICPRIDEUFC says:
    February 4, 2012 at 2:07 am

    The ghost of Steve Nash, very funny. Man, if they had Steve, now that would be a team. Bad luck for Coach Mike. Good win CELTICS. Now beat the Heat and Bulls and we will be talkin…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Chris H says:
    February 4, 2012 at 2:59 am

    Paul, do you worship Rondo or detest the ground he walks on? You seem to waver from sentence to sentence. Rondo didn’t bring it tonight; he is obviously rusty, still feeling stiffness in the wrist, not to mention the shiner to his eye in the first half. In regards to Pierce, I agree with you and James — he’s taking way too many shots, dribbling too much, turning the ball over too much, etc, yet he’s also the only guy who is consistently scoring while creating his own shots, something the rest of the team isn’t as good at (Rondo will never be Rose). Let’s hope there is time in this season for the offense to finally get in a groove. They have a lot of weapons but the ball isn’t moving. HOw much of this is on Doc? For not having a better half court offense?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • James says:
      February 4, 2012 at 3:16 am

      If they rebounded better then they could run more. Like they used to. Then when the Big 3 get winded the youngsters can come in and run some more. Pretty simple, but Doc’s a moron and apparently loves slow molasses half-court offense with everyone standing around and watching. Then after a shot he wants them to all run back on defense ergo we get zip offensive rebs (except CW had 4 critical ones tonight) and less shots usually as we don’t rebound on the defensive end either. I think Thibodeau was/is a better coach than Doc and his being gone really shows. They have the talent to be special, as defense wins championships, but they haven’t shown they want it for 48 mins yet and so maybe they’re coasting already and waiting to give effort in the playoffs? Go Cs…

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • paul says:
        February 4, 2012 at 11:32 pm

        Doc is brilliant at certain things, but at other things he seems to be something like a moron. It took injuries for him to start playing the bench. He would never do it. As far as I can tell he is partially responsible for the slow down game the Celtics play. Couple this with no offensive rebounds and a situation where your best player is relegated to bringing the ball up at a walk and then passing off, and you have a recipe for, yes, one-shot-per-possession MOLASSES.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • paul says:
      February 4, 2012 at 11:28 pm

      I love Rondo, Chris, but we are always the most critical of what we love, aren’t we? And isn’t that how it should be? As regards Pierce, he is still capable of being a top player in the NBA, in stretches, for sure. But Rondo is the best player on the team and it’s long past time for Pierce to start gracefully passing the torch. EVERY CELTIC GREAT HAS DONE THIS. I think Pierce is the first Celtic great who seemed unwilling to help a rising star achieve the pinnacle of greatness. There’s something in Pierce, some Diva aspect, that forces him to grab the spotlight.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • paul says:
        February 4, 2012 at 11:29 pm

        Regarding Rondo and Rose, I think Rondo is better than Rose. Right now Rose is a better finisher, but I think Rondo is a far better passer. Doc has to wake up and start shifting the Celtics offense, gradually, to feature Rondo more.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Chris H says:
    February 4, 2012 at 3:01 am

    PS, I hope Avery Bradley and Wilcox continue to get minutes. We need their hustle and energy. It also puts pressure on Rondo to perform, seeing his backup giving it his all on every play.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • paul says:
      February 4, 2012 at 11:33 pm

      Bradley has been fantastic. Doc pretty much said that he deserves All Star team consideration, and I think Doc is right about that.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. PortCeltic says:
    February 4, 2012 at 5:28 am

    Doc’s comments on this being a game they’ve would lost 2 weeks ago was spot on. After all they didn’t shoot or defend well in that loss to Phx playing without RR. So it’s no coincidence the run started when Doc handed the keys to Pierce in Washington. The results? A 7-2 record with Pierce posting his highest usage and efficiency numbers since 2007. He may be shooting poorly from the field, but he’s making up for it by filing the stat sheet including the highest assist average of his career. Despite 32% shooting from 16-23ft his TS% is 56.5, and based on history that should rise as his mid range game catches fire. With that in mind you could forgive the 8-21 shooting night if a 7 rebound, 5 assist, 30 point night ensues.

    In the interim no one has been more responsible for his team’s turnaround than Pierce. At no point in the 4th quarter could Doc afford to rest him especially with Melo’s potential for late game heroics. In that 4th quarter Melo was held to 1-5 shooting and with Rondo’s help he wasn’t able to get off a shot on a possession that ended with a Landry Fields air ball. Yeah, the results might have been different on Christmas Day with Pierce in the line up.

    Pierce withstanding, they are not very efficient offensive team because they lack a post game and another scorer who get his shot off the dribble in an ISO situation. But we’ve learned he has a bag of tricks at his disposal, which makes up for those deficiencies and the loss of key personnel (RR). Albeit the turnovers leaving the ball in hands will keep Rondo fresher and that’s a bonus.

    Criticizing Pierce and complaining over a fruitless first half is short sided given the 5-9 record after the home loss to Phx. They’re now decimal points away from the #1 defense in the league after ranking in the middle of the pack only few weeks ago, and suddenly in hot pursuit of Philly who have embarked on a wickedly difficult February schedule.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • James says:
      February 4, 2012 at 1:41 pm

      I agree to a point, but beating weak teams is not all that impressive. Look at who they have beaten in their current streak. Only Orlando is a quality team and they aren’t very good. When they start beating playoff caliber teams consistently then I’ll be more on-board. If they rebounded better and focused on that then the ‘middle’ issues would not be such an issue. They turn the ball over way too much, foul too much and give up way too many offensive rebounds and the stats prove that out. PP is playing better and has run the offense well, but his defending SUCKS and while you may like his 30-pt effort and other positive stats I don’t like his matador defense and standing around and certainly his lack of overall hustle. Again, as I said, watch him next game when he does not have the ball and see what he is doing. And if he boxes out then it’s a miracle because it’s hard to box your man out when you’re standing still all the time. And if you’re satisfied with this 2-pt win then so be it, but I think they can play a whole lot better and beat teams like NY/Cleve/Wash (NY has no bench), by dbl digits. And where was Moore tonight? Come-on Doc let’s not fall back into your not playing the youngsters syndrome please. Go Cs…beat some real teams.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • PortCeltic says:
        February 4, 2012 at 5:22 pm

        @James

        Rebounding for sure is a palpable weakness, and even at their zenith they were always prone to turnovers. BTW …they won the battle of the boards last night. But I’m not confident about them improving in that department unless a buyout or trade is made. What has improved dramatically is their team defense. As in years past when they were sloppy or not shooting well they relied on their defense to win games, which is precisely what happened last night. NY came out with tons of energy, but after a 55 point first half they were held to 34 second half points, shot 34% in the 4th quarter and went 0-10 on threes.

        Pierce was instrumental during the comeback and his second half defense on Melo was stout. Sure, it wasn’t pretty, but it counts as much as a double digit win in Orlando. Now we’re starting to get healthy and quiet possibly can field the most athletic bench in the big 3 era.

        Which brings me to the rotation. I think you’re right about E’Twaun getting squeezed. We know Bass/MP3 (Pietrus FOR 3)/Wilcox/ Bradley round out 6 through 9. That 10th man may come down to game situations. Last night it was Sasha because someone had to man up with Melo without Pierce on the floor. With Pietrus backing up Ray, the minutes at the 2 spot are limited. Bradley did play 16 effective minutes, but will have dismal nights. So that’s when I think E’Twaun’s number will be called. I’d rather see Doc toggle the young talent instead of defaulting back to Dooling who should be used as trade bait.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • paul says:
      February 4, 2012 at 11:36 pm

      It’s too easy to settle the power struggle between Rondo and Pierce by elimination of Rondo, our best player. Those two guys MUST find synergy together. If they do, it could mean a championship.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. James says:
    February 4, 2012 at 6:25 pm

    They can improve their rebounding by blocking out and actually putting the effort in. The problem is Doc coaches as a guard, which of course is natural but that is hurting the team on the boards as a guard’s responsibility is to get back on defense. Unfortunately, after almost every shot the Cs take they all are standing still or moving backwards. Just watch how many times they follow their shots to the glass. Many times only RR is in the paint trying to rebound vs 4 defenders. The Cs give up way too many offensive boards. When they won the title in 2008 they were 3rd in rebounding. 2010 vs Lakers they were 23rd. Now 29th -

    http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/team/_/stat/rebounds-per-game

    So let’s say they play the Lakers in a finals series, and so based on current standings they are giving up 6 rebs. Convert those to shots which they become and the Lakers if the hit just 2 shots are 4 pts ahead in every game. Rebounding is a simple thing to address as it is all about focus and effort. They may not get into the top 10 but being 15-20th would greatly make these close games not so close. The more shots you give the other team the worse it’s going to be to win no matter how good your team defense is. Rebounding is a crucial part of defense and giving up 10+ offensive boards a night is killing the Cs, as it would any team. Recent games they are better but Doc has to talk about it and you NEVER hear him mention it in any of his comments, pre-game, post-game, or when wired in national TV games. Remember Riley’s mantra – “no rebounds, no rings”…there’s a reason his 80′s Lakers focused on rebounding. the Cs can do better but they have to want to and then go make the effort, like CW did last night getting 4 rebs all of which were on the offensive glass thereby giving the Cs 4 more shots and ergo helping them eek out a 2-pt win. You’re right about the subs but I love Bradley’s defense and energy. Go Cs…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • paul says:
      February 4, 2012 at 11:38 pm

      Brilliant comment. I have thought for a long time that Doc’s weakness is that he thinks like a guard. He just doesn’t fully appreciate rebounds, even though guards need rebounds to go on the fast break – but there again, Doc is a guard who doesn’t seem to appreciate fast break basketball! How many times have we seen poor Rondo try to run a one-on-three or one-on-four fast break? He seems to be the only one on the team who even tries.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • James says:
        February 5, 2012 at 2:10 am

        Love all your comments tonight as they show you have more depth then just ranting about the ‘trade’ or RR, although we now know your true feelings re RR. The Celtics should have kept Thibodeau and let Doc go. they also should have kept Clifford Ray as he was working with the ‘bigs’ and that facet of play has diminished since he left. I think this team has more overall talent than the ’08 Championship team but have yet to gel like that team. Age is a factor but if you’re out on the court you can hustle, block out, rebound, set picks, and move to keep offensive flow, which are all key elements of basic wining basketball. While older they have experience and certainly pick their spots and ergo maybe they coast more and flip he switch when needed but it falls on Doc to get them to play hard from the first jump ball, not from a deficit in the 4th qtr. DA should hire a coach for the bigs again to work with Stiemsma, Wilcox, Bass, Johnson, and even JO and KG. Certainly might get their rebounding to improve and ratchet up their stellar recent defense even more. Go Cs…

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

← Glen Davis suspended by Orlando Magic for two games
On Kevin Garnett’s random, in-rhythm three-pointer →
  • Tiq IQ

    Boston Celtics tickets
  • Recent Posts

    • 2013 NBA Draft: Celtics set to work out 12 draft prospects, including 6 point guards
    • Doc Rivers turned down an offer to be Orlando Magic team president
    • Terrence Williams arrested for brandishing a firearm
    • Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
    • Exit Interviews: Courtney Lee
  • Recent Comments

    • Boston Celtics Daily Links 5/24 - Todays Top Sports . com on Doc Rivers turned down an offer to be Orlando Magic team president
    • James on Terrence Williams arrested for brandishing a firearm
    • sam on Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
    • NBA Celtics Fan » Boston Celtics Daily Links – news, rumors, and opinion on Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
    • RSN » Boston Celtics Daily Links 5/18 on Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
  • Follow us


  • Blogroll

    • Ball Don't Lie
    • Boston Celtics Tickets
    • Boston Globe Celtics Coverage
    • Boston Herald Celtics Coverage
    • Celtics Blog
    • Celtics Life
    • CLNS Radio
    • CSNNE Celtics Coverage
    • D-League Digest
    • ESPNBoston Celtics Blog
    • Posting and Toasting
    • Red's Army
    • State of the Celtics
    • TrueHoop
    • Twitter Sports – Celtics
    • WEEI's Green Street
  •   Celtics Rumors & News >

Celtics Town | Boston Celtics blog | Celtics news is powered by WordPress

Dansette