• Home
  • About Celtics Town
  • Contact Us
  • NBA Blog Links
  • Privacy Policy

On Paul Pierce’s accomplishment, passing Larry Bird on the Boston Celtics all-time scoring list

In the eye of Boston sports, surpassing Larry Bird is overtaking the golden deity of hard work, floor burns and triple doubles. It’s overcoming the patron saint of jump shots, floor vision and well-deserved cockiness. It’s taking a scalpel and engraving your name directly above the king’s.

Bird will always wear a crown in Boston, but it’s time to start fitting Paul Pierce for a matching diadem.

If you want an argument for why Danny Ainge should not consider trading Pierce, regardless of what happens with the Celtics during the remainder of Pierce’s contract, watch the highlight of The Truth drilling a three from the right wing with 10:23 remaining in last night’s the third quarter. Watch his hands rise to the rafters. Watch Jermaine O’Neal draw the best-timed technical foul of his career. Watch the crowd collectively rise to its feet and throw 14 seasons worth of cheers Pierce’s way, remaining on its feet well after play resumed. Watch all those things and measure loyalty against rebuilding from scratch, and think about what it would feel like to see Pierce wearing another jersey, suiting up for the opponent, and ask yourself if there are certain prizes more important than winning.

Before Pierce overtook Bird for second place on the Boston Celtics scoring list with a three-pointer over the outstretched (and lumpy) arm of Boris Diaw, Tommy Heinsohn tried to explain how players like Pierce make commentating fun. I’m paraphrasing here, but Heinsohn said something to the effect of, “I get to watch a lot of players grow, a lot of people grow up. When Pierce came to Boston, he didn’t know up from down. He played on bad teams, did some dumb things, but he kept growing. He fought through the bad teams, fought through his own ignorant comments, fought through being stabbed in the back, and found the time to master his craft. Want to know the type of guy Pierce is? When they asked him to be the captain, he bought books on leadership and studied how to better himself.”

Pierce is often methodical in his motion, so we underrate his athletic ability. He entered the NBA with a complete arsenal of skills, so we overlook the work he put in to add his present layer of polish. He instantly fit so seamlessly with the Big Three that we hardly noticed the transformation to his game, the changes he made to fit more easily into the machine. It has become easy to overlook Pierce’s greatness — he has never won a scoring title, never earned an MVP trophy, never been named to the First-Team All-NBA — but 14 years later, with a long bomb from the right wing, leaning to the side to wish it in just like he’s done so many times throughout the years, Pierce trails only John Havlicek on the scoring list of the world’s winningest basketball franchise.

Chris Herren, who you might know from the ESPN documentary “Unguarded”, or from his book “Basketball Junkie,” or perhaps you’ve heard of his drug troubles, or maybe you remember him from his days as a temporary starting point guard for the Boston Celtics, remembers more regrets than most. One thing he regrets is not learning from his former teammate Paul Pierce.

“This is your job. Treat it like your job. I look back in shame that I used to pull up to the arena and spend an hour and 45 minutes (there),” Herren said during a December speaking engagement in front of the NBA D-League’s Springfield Armor and Maine Red Claws. “You’re getting paid to work. There ain’t a job in this world that’s two hours long. There’s nowhere in this world you can go get paid for two hours. Paul Pierce showed me what it was to work. He turned those days into eight-hour work days. He worked like the guy picking up garbage. Not two hours.”

Herren said he would arrive at practice and see Pierce in soaking wet clothes, already having put himself through a pre-practice workout. And when Herren left the gym after practice, Pierce would be asking the equipment manager for another pair of mesh shorts, so that he could do more shooting drills by himself. He worked like the guy picking up garbage, when in reality he was already an NBA All-Star during just his third season as a pro, at age 24. This is how you average 16.5 points as a rookie and never below 18.3 in the 13 seasons since. This is how you become great. This is how you scale the Celtics history books. This is how you pass Larry Bird.

Havlicek remains 4,598 points ahead of Pierce, who now has 21,797. Though hardly a given, it is possible to imagine a day a few years from now when Pierce passes Havlicek to become the greatest scorer in franchise history. Then, like tonight, the crowd would be filled with memories both good and bad — Pierce asking for a trade; scoring 46 points after halftime to defeat the New Jersey Nets; wrapping a towel on his head during a postgame press conference; hitting a jumper over Ron Artest after getting his pants dropped to his ankles; standing at the free throw line during Game 7 against Cleveland and sealing a trip to the Eastern Conference Finals; leading the Celtics to a 17th NBA championship — and the overwhelming knowledge that Pierce has grown from a boy to a man in the City of Champions.

To set records and win championships in Boston is expected. To pass Larry Bird is to float above the clouds and proclaim yourself an equal to the shining sun. To mature and to grow and to become someone an entire city can be proud of — there are more than 21,797 reasons why the TD Garden crowd briefly refused to sit down.

Related posts:

  1. Video: Paul Pierce video tribute after passing Larry Bird on Celtics scoring list
  2. Celtics 94, Bobcats 84: Paul Pierce passes Larry Bird on Celtics scoring list
  3. Garnett passes Bird on NBA’s all-time scoring list
  4. Highlight Reel: Larry Bird clutch plays
  5. SBNation: Tough to imagine Larry Bird as black

categories Celtics Blog | Jay King | February 7, 2012

29 Responses to “On Paul Pierce’s accomplishment, passing Larry Bird on the Boston Celtics all-time scoring list”

  1. paul says:
    February 7, 2012 at 11:22 pm

    We have never measured our players the way the rest of the league does. To the rest of the league, PP was never a superstar. We knew better.

    But the current crop of fans has forgotten all that. They like nothing more than to fantasize about trading away for ‘superstars’. I’m ashamed to be a celtics fan today when I look at how these fans think. Yeah, we should have traded Cousy for Oscar, Bill for Wilt, Dave for Mcadoo, Larry for MJ, etc.. Now they want to trade Rondo for anyone, anyone at all. Currently they are hot for Pau Gasol. It’s disgusting. It’s like people need a primer on being a Celtics fan.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  2. James says:
    February 7, 2012 at 11:44 pm

    Congrats to PP. Not his biggest fan and he’s not the player Bird was, and never will be, but this is a great achievement and shows what hard work can do if one applies the necessary time and effort to improve one’s skills. Note to paul…PP is not a ‘superstar’ and never will be. He’s a great player and deserves having his Celtic # in the rafters and going to the HOF. But superstar is not in the discussion. Bird, Magic, MJ, Tiger, Brady, Montana, Gretzky, Kobe, Shaq, McEnroe, Connors, etc. are superstars. Go Cs…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2

    • paul says:
      February 8, 2012 at 10:18 am

      I agree that Bird was on a higher level as a player, but I really get tired of all this super star crap. Dwight Howard, a guy who only half plays?

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • James says:
        February 8, 2012 at 10:30 am

        Agreed. DH is a great rebounder and has great future potential and needs to get a better offensive game, but he is not even close to guys like Malone, Lanier, Shaq, even Unseld. The word is used way too loosely these days and that’s because the league is watered down and many never saw the players that are superstars play. Go Cs…

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. pearl31 says:
    February 8, 2012 at 12:28 am

    PP is more like Adrian Dantley or Nique. Bird scored the points in 100 , yes ONE HUNDRED less games and on teams where he shared the rock.

    Pierce has been great the last 4 plus years but before that, really? Maybe it is unfair because he never got to play with other good players, but if he did he would be at 17k points.

    Congrats to him his game is a joy to watch. Footwork , balance, release.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  4. greg says:
    February 8, 2012 at 5:24 am

    HATERS!! bunch of HATERS!!!!!! instead of being happy for your teams leader and give him what he deserves, u guys have the fucking nerve to say his not a superstar????????? FUCK YOU GUYS seriously!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • paul says:
      February 8, 2012 at 10:18 am

      My goodness. We don’t worship the ground PP walks on enough, do we?

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • James says:
      February 8, 2012 at 10:20 am

      Oh, ouch. How can I go on now? A superstar is someone that leads his team, or himself as in an individual sport, to multiple championships and PP is stuck at 1 with KG being the real superstar that gave PP his championship. Scoring is just one factor and your blinders are preventing you from seeing that PP is just not in the league of stars that I previously mentioned. Never will be either. Nice post, thanks for the lovely ‘hate’ you doled out. Ergo I guess you’re a “hater” too??? And I have given PP plenty of praise over the 3 years I’ve been on this blog, criticism too when deserved, so where have you been? PP is a great player but not a superstar. Even the Cs pay KG more than PP so that should enlighten you too. Go Cs…

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. len says:
    February 8, 2012 at 9:19 am

    Pierce’s game has no flash so his skills are underestimated even by knowledgeable fans. When you look at the total package his offensive and defensive skills, his ability to play point guard if necessary and his ability to take the big shot he ranks right up there with the greats…including Larry Bird.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • paul says:
      February 8, 2012 at 10:19 am

      Not quite. But he is a brilliant all-around player, very much in the Havlicek, Bird tradition

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

    • James says:
      February 8, 2012 at 10:26 am

      He is nowhere close to Bird and maybe you don’t realize that unless you watched Bird night in and night out. I’ve watched since 1960 and so I think I can say with confidence that PP, while a great Celtic, is not a better ALL-AROUND player than the others I listed in another post. Bird’s stats were accomplished in less games and with better talent as teammates than PP has had until KG and RA showed up in 2008 (3 of his 14 yrs). Go Cs…

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. len says:
    February 8, 2012 at 9:27 am

    Scorer’s Touch: Pierce vs Bird
    Pierce Bird
    Pts 21,797 21,791
    FT 5,910 3,960
    3-pt FG 1,617 649

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. len says:
    February 8, 2012 at 9:33 am

    Reposting so it is easier to read:
    Scorer’s Touch: Pierce vs Bird
    Pierce Bird
    Pts 21,797 21,791
    FT 5,910 3,960
    3-pt FG 1,617 649

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • len says:
      February 8, 2012 at 9:33 am

      that did not work

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. len says:
    February 8, 2012 at 9:39 am

    This article ranks Pierce as the 4th best player in Celtics history:

    http://greenstreet.weei.com/sports/boston/basketball/celtics/2012/02/06/where-does-paul-pierce-rank-among-celtics-greats/

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. paul says:
    February 8, 2012 at 10:21 am

    The Celtics Great rankings are utter crap. They never even consider Cowens who, as the unquestioned leader of the seventies Celtics led the team to two championships, should be third on the alltime list.

    PP has to take responsibility for winning that second championship. And to do it he needs to achieve synergy with Rondo, whatever it takes. Put up or shut up Paul. Win that second championship.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • James says:
      February 8, 2012 at 10:36 am

      Unless someone has seen Havlicek, Jo Jo White, Cowens, et al play then making a list of great Celtics is worthless. If any one under 40, assuming they started paying attention at age 10 or in 1982, ever saw the players before Bird, McHale, DJ and Parish then they would be astonished that PP is even #10 on such a list of great Celtics. Win more titles and maybe he moves up. But then so should KG who in my mind is a much better representative of Celtic tradition and is a better overall player than PP. It’s not just about scoring people. Go Cs…

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • len says:
        February 8, 2012 at 11:19 am

        I don’t think Larry Bird would have done any better than PP did during the 2008 playoff series again Cleveland/James and the Finals versus the Lakers/Kobe. PP outplayed the 2 best players in the game today.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

        • James says:
          February 8, 2012 at 11:30 am

          Your comment makes me think you never saw Bird play. That’s OK and PP did a wonderful job in those series. He’s no slouch but Bird would have been even better vs those two as he was ruthless and that’s a major difference between the two. Bird never took one minute off in any game he ever played as a Celtic or with Indiana St. It just wasn’t in his DNA and that’s the main difference between the two. If you watched Bird, even vs the worst teams he faced, you would understand why he is revered and is closest to Russell as any Celtic that ever put on the green. Go Cs…

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          • len says:
            February 8, 2012 at 11:56 am

            That is just hogwash…the 80′s Celtics were notorious for sleepwalking through their games and only turning it on during the 4th quarter.

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          • James says:
            February 8, 2012 at 1:13 pm

            Again, you answered my question because it’s obvious you never watched Bird or those teams. You don’t go 40-1 at home “sleep-walking” through games. Those players with Bird were all intense all the time like KG but not like light-switch PP. Go Cs…

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. len says:
    February 8, 2012 at 2:25 pm

    I was a fan in the 80′s and watch the games as religiously as I do know. The fact that the team coasted during most of the games is well known and freely admitted by the former players including Kevin McHale.
    “FLAW THAT HELD THEM BACK HISTORICALLY
    Quite simply, the ’86 Celtics (67-15) got bored at times; you could catch them on the right night if they were tired or not paying attention. Eleven of their 15 regular-season losses were to sub-.500 teams (including the 23-win Knicks, 26-win Pacers and 29-win Cavs), but they finished 19-2 against 50-win teams. These guys should have cracked the 70-win barrier and even admit as much now.
    or the West Coast trip when Bird got bored and decided he’d only shoot with his left hand for the Portland game”

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. James says:
    February 8, 2012 at 3:34 pm

    So PP can’t do that as he just takes games off and not because he’s ‘not challenged’. The fact that Bird played that way only bolsters the argument that PP is not in his league. Go Cs…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. len says:
    February 8, 2012 at 3:58 pm

    The point I am trying to make is the 80′s Celtics did not play pedal to the metal in every game. I am sure they did go all out when playing the Lakers and the Sixers…but with lesser teams they would relax and turn it on at the end of game. It would work most of the time, but sometimes they lost games they should have easily won. I really think it amused them to toy with a lesser team then wallop them in the 4th quarter. As far as PP being in same league as Larry Legend I don’t think that is a stretch…yes Bird was clearly a better player but Pierce will certainly go down in history as one of the Celtics all time greats. Don’t forget Pierce’s career and body of work is not over and it was his play and leadership, after his heel recovered and he got his legs back that was critical to the current turn around we are seeing with the team now.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. James says:
    February 8, 2012 at 4:12 pm

    Len…I generally like your posts but we will just never agree about PP being as good, or anywhere near as good, as Bird. Sorry, but PP hasn’t earned the side-by-side comparison or equality because he flat out does not bring it every night as evidenced by his 1-10 3-pt shooting last night and 1 measly FT. To break the record he tried to do it ‘dramatically’ whereas Bird just would have driven to the basket or taken shorter shots and then raised his hand for about a millisecond to acknowledge the feat and fans and moved on. PP is too hung up on individual glory no matter how many times he talks about ‘team’. His play speaks otherwise and ergo why some, including me, were calling for his trade earlier before he woke up and started playing like he’s supposed to. Go Cs…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • len says:
      February 8, 2012 at 9:26 pm

      Reasonable people can disagree..I like your posts…I am not saying he is as good Bird…I just don’t agree that there is as huge of a dropoff when go from Bird to Pierce.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. James says:
    February 8, 2012 at 10:18 pm

    Bird was +4 in rebs, +2.5 APG, and shot .496 to PP’s .448 in almost 100 less games while averaging +2.1 pts per game more. Those are pretty wide differences and why I believe PP isn’t close to Bird. Go Cs…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. Noblejoker says:
    February 8, 2012 at 10:20 pm

    Opinions are like aholes – everybody has one. I don’t have the scope of experience to compare the older players to the newer and it is a fool’s errand anyway. Were the olden days better or worse? Are players more athletic now, better shooters, etc or is the league watered down as there are so many teams. Does all the video work and ‘business’ of coaching etc make the league better or worse. No person or stat can say for sure – it’s just opinion.
    Personally I find it real hard to believe that someone like Dwight Howard were he transported in a time machine would not dominate at most any time in the league but that’s just me.
    For me Paul Pierce is the greatest Celtic of all time. I have only seen Bird on tape and haven’t watched much of earlier C’s ball. I didn’t live through the heydays of the 60′s and 80′s. I can appreciate it, understand it and revel in the tradition but I wasn’t there. So I respect your opinions and it’s fn to share them here. Here’s mine:
    To me and in my time PP is the greatest Celtic and I don’t need to compare him to enjoy that fact.

    I agree that his all around game and general durability are under-rated league wide but haters gunna hate. Screw them. I think he is one of the top 50 players of the last 20 years, maybe top 20.

    This guy deserves our unreserved support and love as a life-time C’s champion. If they insult him with a trade I don’t know what I will do but I will die a little inside. C’s and PP for life :)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  16. James says:
    February 8, 2012 at 10:56 pm

    I understand your feelings and if I was as young as you I’d likely feel the same way. But I think I would value KG and RA more for PP’s ring than PP himself. He deserves all the accolades and is definitely a great player. I just wish he’d stop camping at the Rasheed 3-line and defend and rebound with more hustle attached to each. I love him too, but not as much as I love KG. And you’re right, he is one of the top 50 players in the last 20 years. Go Cs…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

← Video: Paul Pierce video tribute after passing Larry Bird on Celtics scoring list
Kevin Garnett speaks about his best friend Paul Pierce passing Larry Bird →
  • Tiq IQ

    Boston Celtics tickets
  • Recent Posts

    • Terrence Williams arrested for brandishing a firearm
    • Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
    • Exit Interviews: Courtney Lee
    • Exit Interviews: Terrence Williams
    • Exit Interviews: Jeff Green
  • Recent Comments

    • James on Terrence Williams arrested for brandishing a firearm
    • sam on Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
    • NBA Celtics Fan » Boston Celtics Daily Links – news, rumors, and opinion on Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
    • RSN » Boston Celtics Daily Links 5/18 on Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
    • NBA Celtics Fan » Boston Celtics Daily Links 5/18 on Washburn: Paul Pierce’s family is preparing for relocation
  • Follow us


  • Blogroll

    • Ball Don't Lie
    • Boston Celtics Tickets
    • Boston Globe Celtics Coverage
    • Boston Herald Celtics Coverage
    • Celtics Blog
    • Celtics Life
    • CLNS Radio
    • CSNNE Celtics Coverage
    • D-League Digest
    • ESPNBoston Celtics Blog
    • Posting and Toasting
    • Red's Army
    • State of the Celtics
    • TrueHoop
    • Twitter Sports – Celtics
    • WEEI's Green Street
  •   Celtics Rumors & News >

Celtics Town | Boston Celtics blog | Celtics news is powered by WordPress

Dansette