Lakers 88, Celtics 87: Boston loses ugly affair

Whoever keeps track of fast break points should have taken the night off. The Lakers and Celtics could have checked the ball after every possession rather than sprinting to the other end of the court, a rules change that Derek Fisher certainly would have preferred. This was basketball played at the pace of a balding man with dentures, a plodding, grinding, triceratops-type affair that featured little space to breathe but plenty of room to second-guess.
Both teams shot under 40 percent, combined to miss 114 shots and needed binoculars to see the century mark despite a session of overtime. To escape with a win, Boston needed to sink just one more open look, or perhaps a contested stepback by Paul Pierce with time dwindling. Or the Celtics could have used one additional stop — possibly a box out on Los Angeles’ final possession in regulation, which ended with a Pau Gasol putback. The Celtics missed plenty of chances; at the end, Pierce’s shot soared off line and Gasol emerged from the right side of my television screen to deny Ray Allen’s tip-in attempt.
The game started like this (via SB Nation):

but quickly evolved into Los Angeles’ front line (with a marginal helping of Kobe Bryant) vs. Boston’s irrationally disorganized offense, Los Angeles’ second-chance opportunities vs. Boston’s outside jump shots. The Lakers played their always-potent “make Rondo beat us” defense, which they seem to accomplish better than any other team because of their length inside and Kobe’s presence as a help defender. Lacking cohesion or any semblance of execution, the Celtics shot five free throws and deserved few more, since the paint seemed to be lined with a powerful repellent.
The result was an ugly loss, a bad loss, a loss that ended with a Pierce miss but could not be pinpointed on any single failure. The Celtics played hard on Thursday night but they did not play well, and it cost them.
Game Notes:
—– Kobe started with an oddly passive demeanor, especially considering that he normally plays like a great white shark swimming through a pool of fish. But once he started to feel it, the aggression came. Ray Allen and Mickael Pietrus, as the Celtics usually do, made Kobe work for his shots, but there’s not a lot defenders can do after tapping the ball away twice, seeing Kobe double-dribble it, contesting a fadeaway 20-footer and watching it splash through the rim. Do I sound bitter mentioning the double-dribble? Not me.
—- There are two sides to Paul Pierce’s final shot in overtime:
1) Team offense always beats an iso, especially when the iso is against Metta World Peace, who still has some of his Artestian defensive chops remaining.
2) It’s Paul Pierce, it’s his favorite shot, and team offense didn’t amount to squat at the end of regulation.
I would have preferred a play with multiple options, but I understand why the Pierce iso was called. Kind of. Not really. Okay, maybe Doc should have drawn up something else.
—- Gasol’s block on Ray Allen to end the game was an awesome effort. If Gasol didn’t get there by a fingernail, Allen had a wide open layup to end the game. /hits self in face repeatedly with the butt end of the remote control
—- Who ya got in a shooting contest: Steve Blake, Troy Murphy, Derek Fisher or Air Bud?
—- Kevin Garnett’s legs have been gradually gaining springs for the past few weeks, culminating in a few loud dunks tonight. He also, sadly, missed an open three-pointer late in overtime that might have won the game.
—- Jermaine O’Neal had a loud dunk, too. Coincidentally, he injured himself on the play.
—- Speaking of O’Neal, I often have trouble judging how well he played. The first half, for example, Bynum seemed to grab every rebound and own the paint. But he somehow shot just 3-for-11, and O’Neal contested almost every shot. The Lakers inside duo (Bynum and Gasol) finished with a combined 41 points and 31 rebounds and O’Neal hardly did anything stat-wise (1-3 shooting, two points, six rebounds and three blocks in 33 minutes), but part of me felt he did a good job? O’Neal confuses me. I hate him and then I love him and then I have no clue what the hell to think, and all those emotions often come during the same possession.
—- Bynum is very tough to stop. Bynum would be even more tough to stop if Mike Brown paid the other Lakers every time they passed to the big fella.
—- While watching that game I wasn’t sure whether to vomit, funnel a fifth of vodka, repeatedly poke myself in the eye until I couldn’t see the television screen anymore, or applaud two teams for a scrappy, competitive bout.
—- Rebounding, rebounding, rebounding. Damn it.
—- Smush Parker, God bless his soul, knows this look all too well (via SB Nation):

—- I never thought I would write these words in this order, but Avery Bradley (sore shoulder) really could have made a difference. Upon facing one possession of Bradley’s defense, Steve Blake would have run straight for the exits and Andrew Goudeluck would have offered his jersey to the nearest ball boy. The Celtics needed a spark tonight to force them into a transition game, where baskets might have been easier to come by. Bradley could have given it. (Note: I never thought I’d reach this place, either.)
—- It’s tough to win when Garnett and Pierce combine to shoot 13-41, but the Celtics hung in due to their now-always-present defense. I’m not sure whether to react with pessimism or optimism.
Related posts:





In Rondo’s defense, Gasol was obviously stung by the trade rumors, and Rondo was obviously unsettled by them. Danny continues to put Rondo into a no-win situation where he is the team’s real leader, as the way our offense stagnates when Rondo isn’t aggressive shows, but he is never allowed by Danny to even begin to feel that he has any leadership status, because he is constantly made to feel that he is on the next boat out of town.
That said, the offense fell apart tonight when Rondo was faced with the Sag tonight, and once again allowed himself to be utterly destroyed as a player by it. I know it’s a harsh way to say it, but he allowed Kobe Bryant to emasculate him tonight, in basketball terms.
I think Rondo needs to publicly take the blame for this loss. Yeah, the Bigs got hammered, and yeah Pierce never really showed up, and yeah Doc’s game plan was exactly what you’d expect from the guy who apparently barely got in on the redeye from North Carolina before gametime, but in the end, Rondo is our general, and our best player, and this one is on him. Period. No excuse for this one, Rajon.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Sorry but RR was not the reason they lost tonight. Stupid play, lack of boxing out, and taking lame shots at the worst times (did we really needed a fall-away from PP at the end of OT?) and yes RR took a couple of ill advised jumpers but the Cs had ONLY 5 FTs tonight and those were all in the first half. Live by the jumper and so they died by the jumper. Missing AB hurt bad as he would have helped pressure Blake when RR decided to dbl team elsewhere. The Cs had this game and gave it away. They gave Troy Murphy 9 rebs, PP let Barnes light him up, and why not use Stiemsma or Johnson to rebound vs Bynum and Gasol? If JO can’t handle it then play them and let them foul every time. At least GS would have positioned himself between Bynum /Gasol and the basket. How fundamental is that but all Doc could jabber about was chatting up Kobe and telling the team “we need to run more”. Well genius…it takes REBOUNDS to run and losing the rebounding killed any chance of running. Therefore it back a half-court game and the Cs look f’in lost most of the time with no movement and the clock winding down only to have RR take a jumper of someone else launch one. The Cs played extremely well at times but the constant lack of boxing out and giving Bynum/Gasol extra shots just killed all the good work. And Doc’s play call at the end of regulation when no real shot went up spoke volumes about his being away yesterday and the lack of focus on the team he is in charge of. For such an important game it’s just mind-boggling that they had a day off on Wednesday so Doc could watch his son. Retire Doc and do us and the Cs a favor please. Pathetic. Go Cs…watch a beginner’s DVD on how to play defense by blocking your man out and winning the rebounding stat.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Oh I agree with you on the rebounding and the lack of boxing out, but some of that was unavoidable. We are simply weak down low, and also, the Lakers’ offense draws so much help to their Big Three scorers, that blocking out becomes harder. The Bigs are constantly recovering.
But yes, Rondo lost us the game. There is no excuse, no acceptable excuse, for him allowing the Rondo Sag to ONCE AGAIN take him out of the game. When they don’t guard him, he has to make them pay. Sometimes that means pushing the ball up the court harder, so the D can’t set. Often that means taking the shot they give you and living with the results. Rondo has reportedly done a lot of work improving his shot. I know the wrist hurt that, but when you choose not to attack the other team, you are giving up more than just a basket. YOU ARE SURRENDERING. When the offense stagnates for long periods of time, it’s ultimately Rondo’s fault. Sometimes it means taking the ball right at your man, who is sagging off you, and forcing him to pick you up. Rondo had what, no free throws yesterday, or two, while the team had five? RONDO IS OUR BEST ATTACKER IN THE PAINT. We agreed at the start of the season that we needed ten ft a game from Rondo. Sometimes it means sneaking down to the wing, or even backdooring, so that your sagging defender has to either cover you, or let you attack the basket on the wing.
I’m done being a Rondo fan until and unless he takes responsibility for these long offensive breakdowns, and for making the opposition pay when they play off him. He is our best player and our floor general. HE CANNOT ALLOW THE OTHER DEFENSE TO TAKE HIM OUT OF THE GAME. That is the one option that he must not take.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Exactly how is not boxing out “unavoidable”???? Are you kidding me? All the Celtic players have to do is to stay with their man and block out. Or, if they’ve doubled-teamed then find a man and block out (and way too much dbl teaming for me). Pretty simple and certainly not “unavoidable”. Rebounding is all about desire and effort both of which this group seems to think is unimportant. Well the 31 rebs Bynum/Gasol got last night should have been 20 max and that’s the game changer; not RR’s inability to shoot or drive consistently when sagged. Go Cs…learn to f’in BOX OUT!!!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
It’s been a long time but… Didn’t you feel like you miss Perk again seeing Gasol and Bynum practically playing their own little game of volleyball under the offensive boards like that?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
No we don’t need Perk…see my comments on the other game post just before this post. Perk sucks and his skills are deteriorating so fast he’s going to be a bench player only soon; especially after Ibaka’s effort tonight. Maybe if KG, BB, MP, PP and JO actually tried to box out and stay between Bynum and Gasol they wouldn’t have dominated. There was ZERO effort to box out and this is a major Celtic flaw that needs immediate attention. Hell, I’m 58 and I could have had dbl rebs vs the Cs tonight. Just watch next time a shot goes up and you’ll see the total lack of effort to gain position advantage which every kid is taught but of course not on Doc’s teams. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
You don’t get it at all, do you? Jermaine is a great backup center. He comes in with real shotblocking abilities, and a little saavy around the basket, and some attitude. He and Perk would be a fearsome duo. But as a starter, HE IS TERRIBLE. We need the presence and awareness that Perkins gave us inside. We need it BADLY. Stop defending a position that never made any sense at all. No one has ever claimed that Perkins was a stat machine
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Hey paul… you just made my point so thank you. JO is a back-up at this point of his career and would have been last year as Shaq was our starting center (had a 2-yr deal, too). Perk was injured but would have been Shaq’s back up as we had the best record and were playing great championship caliber ball with Shaq (not with Perk). Then we traded Perk KNOWING we were extremely weak on the bench with no real back-up for PP. So we traded Perk who WAS NOT GOING TO GET PAID WHAT HE WAS DEMANDING and was the only tradable piece the Cs had to use. Therefore, we got Green but Shaq was injured and it turns out that the injury ENDED his career, otherwise he’d still be our starting center. You CANNOT keep looking back in hindsight and say the trade was bad. It helped the Cs and can still pay dividends when Green comes back to what is now a very improved bench. No one can foresee injuries and now Perk is playing terrible and stats do tell the story. Please stop crying about the ‘trade’ because it was a year ago and nothing can be undone. Would I prefer Perk now being a Celtic based on PAST events…of course, even as much as I believe he is a mediocre center. But we are living in the present and have to deal with what is going on now. We are weak in the middle but partly because our front line does not rebound or block out as they should…thereby making them look weaker than they truly are. If they rebounded better then Bynun/Gasol would not be dominating as they did last night. We are also without Krstic who more than held his own and would likely be getting good minutes. Remember him? My issue with JO is that if he is not producing (actually playing better lately) or having trouble due to fouls or age then use Stiemsma and/or Johnson. We had two guys 7′ and 6’10 ride the bench because Doc is a lame coach and would rather ride the vets than use two young guys, with size, who have proven they can play defense and more importantly rebound. So thank you for helping me make my case again for the thousandth time. I’ll continue to support the trade and will reiterate all this again until you realize…living in hindsight or a ‘what if’ world DOES NOT HAVE ANY VALIDITY. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I agree 100%. You need to give the young blood a chance to prove themselves. I have always felt that Doc does not rotate his players properly and instead of giving fresh legs a run, he plays the veterans who have legs have taken years of beatings. It’s just plain stupid. Doc’s focus should be on how to make the Celtics better and not jetsetting around the place to watch his son. Flashback: 2010 finals when RA shot 0-13 and former ALLSTAR Michael Finley didn’t even get a decent run from memory. Start listening to the fans Mr Rivers because we ain’t happy.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Going with the veterans last night was vintage Doc.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
The Bottom Line is this: when Rondo plays aggressively, we thrive. When he doesn’t, we die.
This won’t be the last night we get pummeled inside. That’s not the key problem. We simply are not a stout team in the paint. What we are now is an ENERGY team. And as such, we cannot have Rondo, our best player and our key energy guy, drift out of games as he CONSTANTLY does. When Rondo is paying attention and playing with energy, he is possibly the best player in the league, and we thrive. When he starts walking, and standing around, and not doing much in particular, we stall out.
That’s why Bradley would have made a difference. Bradley seems to perk up the team’s energy, and he seems to remind Rondo to wake up. He’s Red Bull for the team and for Rondo.
But for God’s sake, Rondo shouldn’t need that.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I agree to a point, but if our team rebounded better, because it’s all about desire and effort, then RR would see that and I think that would help ‘motivate’ him to be more aggressive. When he is the only Celtic rebounding vs 4 opposition players or driving to the hoop only to have none of the team follow him to help rebound if he misses then I believe psychologically he thinks why bother unless there’s just a wide opening. If you watch him he picks his spots, but he has also challenged every big man in the league before but again why do so if nobody is in-essence ‘following him into battle’??? They ALL need to attack the rim as getting 5 FTs last night (0 in 2nd half and OT) was clearly a sign that they are settling for jumpers instead of working inside. I guarantee you that if they all put the effort into rebounding better then that ‘energy’ would feed on itself and help them run more, prevent giving up cheap layups, and help their scoring runs be sustained instead of whittled down unnecessarily. Little things like that will help RR be a better player and will enable the offense to work more efficiently. Rebound = fast break. Cheap basket = half court offense where they are severely challenged. Think Doc understands this??? Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Guys, you’re talking in circles here, but the sag defense took Rondo out of his game; he needs to get confident with knocking down a jumper. The rebounding was horrible; however, the lakers do have them outsized, especially with Bynum. Even so, they lost a lot of boards that should have been grabbed up, like the put back by barnes in the fourth quarter. And yes, Doc should have gone with fresh legs, especially if he wanted to run so badly; he did, however, mention the failure of rebounding after the game, yet that doesn’t excuse his lack of practice the day before; he seemed far more enthused at the Duke game than he did at his own. Please, Doc. RETIRE!!!! This team would have won with a simple practice the day before. I truly believe that. They came in unprepared.
Like or Dislike:
0
1