Celtics continue to work through early season growing pains

As Tom so aptly put it, the Celtics showed up on offense last night against an otherwise pesky defense. I’m not ready to say things are completely fixed on the offensive end, only because most of the offensive spark was mediated by Rajon Rondo who was attacking the Bulls’ third-string point guard all night. That being said, the Celtic’s have too many offensive weapons to be held down for long, and the offensive productivity allowed Celtics nation to collectively exhale.
This game was a great test to see how far along the Celtics are on the quest to become a cohesive team. They were aggressive and attacked the Bulls defense, a perfect example of which was the alley-oop dunk from Rondo to KG to twist the dagger for the night, finally declaring the Bulls dead after they continued to fight back. Said Doc (via the Boston Globe) “We thought coming in with this group that we could score. That it just takes time. I thought by far this was our best rhythm offensively.”
Scoring should become easier and easier for this Celtics team, and they can afford to sustain some off nights by some of their key players (Courtney Lee and Pierce) and still find an offensive flow.
As you can probably tell, this post is heading in a bit of a ‘negative Nancy’ direction now. The Celtic’s are still figuring out their defensive rotations, but that will come with time, there are enough athletes on this team and more importantly– Kevin Garnett is still barking orders form the back line. The C’s were out-rebounded 40-34 last night against the Bulls despite both teams having the same number of missed field goals. Jeff Green had a good night, registering five rebounds in his fifteen minutes, but other than him and Rondo (who was in ‘big game triple-double’ mode) the individual rebounding numbers were relatively pedestrian. The Celtics are, wait for it, 30th in the league in rebounds per game.
Rebounding was one of the few issues not directly addressed in the productive 2012 offseason. The Celtics reloaded with bolstered bench scoring and three point shooting, but rebounding help came in the more subtle form of rookie Jared Sullinger along with Darko Milicic and Jason Collins. Darko has seen a total of five minutes all season, with Collins yet to see the floor for Boston in the young season. Rebounding was the name of the game last year, and it seems to have carried over into this year. Playing Garnett at center has been a much acclaimed move, and a decision I am still very much in support of. But there is the downside of the move, which is the Celtic’s lack of size.
Boston will not grow taller and it does not appear that any big trades are on the horizon. PJ Brown is still retired and Perk is still on the Thunder, so the Celtics will likely look internally to solve this problem. While they lack size, they do have depth, which should allow them to run all over the court to find the appropriate person to put a body on and box out. A boost in guard rebounding from guys like Terry and Courtney Lee (both of whom average over 24 minutes a game and less than 1.5 rebounds per game) would go great lengths in finishing possessions and transitioning to the offensive end of the floor, as both are capable ball handlers to spark the fast break.
As the Celtics offense begins to fall into place it provides optimism for growth as this team looks ahead at the 82 game schedule. Rebounding will likely have to be an aspect they address, as it will be an interesting journey as this team continues to work through all of its kinks on the quest to dethrone the Miami Heat.
Related posts:
- Gregg Popovich impressed by Celtics early-season play
- Boston Celtics continue preseason tonight against Toronto Raptors
- My early-season evisceration of Nate Robinson
- Rondo: “I haven’t been playing well. Aches and pains. And we had the trade with Perk.”
- Where will the Boston Celtics finish the regular season? A full NBA regular season preview





energy is what we should have lots of because of our depth. We need to substitute energy for size.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Boston was first in Defensive Rebound Rate coming into last night’s game. Now they’re 4th. If these kinds of numbers hold up, I think it’s more than acceptable. Of course, they’re still last in Offensive Rebounding Rate.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
We’re dead last in rebounding –
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/team/_/stat/rebounds-per-game
As far as being 4th in defensive rebs, if that is really correct, how do we give up 16 offensive rebs to Milwaukee? Go Cs…hit the damn boards better and more frequently!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I was referring to the defensive rebounding percentage, which you can see here the Celtics rate 4th in behind MIL PHI and CLE. Also, I already noted we’re last in offensive rebounding, which obviously brings down rebounding overall. We obviously still aren’t trying to hit the offensive glass, but the effort on the other end is encouraging (granted, small sample size).
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I wasn’t questioning your comment but the criteria that goes into determining 4th or 5th or whatever position if such a team gives up 16 offensive rebs. We have given up the following in games so far – 5, 11, 7, 10, 8, 16, 8, for a total of 57 or 8 off. per game; with 3 games in dbl digits. If that qualifies us for 4th in defensive rebs then either all the other teams are worse or the stat criteria is flawed. To me, it just doesn’t make any sense. Bottom line is we need to be in the mid-teens if we’re going to have any chance for Banner #18. We were #3 in 2008, #23 in 2010 and dead last last year. Rebounding is such a key and Doc just doesn’t focus on it as he should. Go Cs…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
i think in the picture above KG and Noah see something really gross that no one else did because it looks like their gonna throw up. haha
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Better intensity from the Celts last night, wanted the ball more than Bulls also there shooting percentage from the field was good too.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Bottom line, I’m glad we’re going back to old issues as rebounding. It means we’re going back to who we are, with all its up and downs.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Tomorrow night the Celtic with face a tough challenge inside Al Jefferson is averaging 11.5 rebounds per game Paul Millsap is averaging 9.4 and Derick Favours is averaging 7.3 rebounds per.The celtics must another game of solid balanced offensive production and contine to limit there turnovers as a team.Another key will be the energy Chris Wilcox has brought fantastic in his last four games Chirs has averaged 12.5 minutes paer game but is averaging 6.3 points per game he has also average 1.8 boards even though he has only attempted 9 field goals(making 7 of them)he is getting to the line averaging 4 free throws per game.The Celtics have gone 3-1 over that stretch
Like or Dislike:
0
0